Feyh v. City of Sacramento
Filing
103
ORDER granting 101 REQUEST for PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/4/17. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JAMES SANCHEZ, City Attorney (SBN 116356)
BRETT M. WITTER, Supervising Deputy City Attorney (SBN 168340)
BWitter@cityofsacramento.org
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
915 I Street, Room 4010
Sacramento, CA 95814-2608
Telephone: (916) 808-5346
Telecopier: (916) 808-7455
Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01274-TLN-EFB
MICHAEL FEYH, on behalf of himself and
all similarly situated individuals,
ORDER GRANTING CITY OF
SACRAMENTO’S REQUEST FOR
ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT NO.
98, PROOF OF SERVICE
NOTICE TO POTENTIAL
COLLECTIVE ACTION MEMBERS
(VIA U.S. MAIL)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
Based on the City of Sacramento’s request, and good cause appearing therefore,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
The interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the document outweighs the
24
public’s interest in disclosing the information, and there is no legitimate public interest in
25
the disclosure of the confidential information contained within it.
26
2.
The COURT hereby grants a protective order sealing Defendant’s Proof of
27
Service (identified in the Court’s Docket as document number 98).
28
///
1
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: January 4, 2017
3
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?