Bellinder v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/28/16 ORDERING that Wells Fargo shall file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 8/8/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568)
2 SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
3 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
4 Telephone: (415) 398-3344
Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11 RICHARD BELLINDER, individually, and on
behalf of the general public,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
WELLS FARGO, N.A., EXPERIAN
15 INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
16 LLC & TRANS UNION LLC,
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-01289-JAM-AC
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT’S TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
The Hon. John A. Mendez
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
June 10, 2016
None set
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:16-cv-01289-JAM-AC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT’S TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
07685.1678/8169151.1
1
This Court has reviewed the Joint Motion submitted by Plaintiff Richard Bellinder
2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (erroneously sued as Wells Fargo, N.A.)
3 (“Wells Fargo”) to extend Wells Fargo’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint in the above
4 entitled action. Pursuant to the joint motion, the Court orders as follows:
5
Good cause having been shown, Wells Fargo shall file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s
6 complaint on or before August 8, 2016.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 DATED: 7/28/2016
9
10
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
11
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:16-cv-01289-JAM-AC
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT’S TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
07685.1678/8169151.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?