Bellinder v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/2/17 ORDERING that all claims of Plaintiff Richard Bellinder against Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Plaintiff Richard Bellinder and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
4
Linda Deos, (SBN: 179170)
Deos Law, PC
770 L Street, Suite 950
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 442-4442
(916) 583-7693 (Fax)
Linda@deoslaw.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RICHARD BELLINDER,
Case No: 2:16-cv-01289-JAM-AC
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY
WELLS FARGO, N.A., ET AL.
14
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff Richard Bellinder (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, and Defendant Equifax Information
17
18
Services, LLC (“Equifax”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein
19
between them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Equifax
20
only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’
21
fees.
22
Respectfully submitted,
23
Date: March 1, 2017
24
25
26
27
s/ Linda Deos
Linda D. Deos, Esq.
Deos Law, PC
770 L Street, Suite 950
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: 916-442-4442
Fax: 916-583-7693
E-Mail: linda@deoslaw.com
28
Counsel for Plaintiff Richard Bellinder
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC
Page 1 of 4
1
Date: March 1, 2017
2
3
4
5
s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.
Thomas P. Quinn, Jr., Esq.
Nokes & Quinn
410 Broadway, Suite 210
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Telephone: 949-376-3500
Fax: 949-376-3070
E-mail: tquinn@nokesquinn.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Equifax Information
Services, LLC
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Date: March 1, 2017
s/ Kendall W. Carter
Kendall W. Carter, Esq.
King & Spalding, LLP
1180 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: 404-572-2495
Fax: 404-572-5100
E-Mail: kcarter@kslaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Equifax Information
Services, LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC
Page 2 of 4
1
ORDER
2
3
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff
Richard Bellinder against Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC are dismissed, with
5
prejudice. Plaintiff Richard Bellinder and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall
6
each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
7
8
9
10
Date: March 2, 2017
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
JUDGE, United States District Court,
Eastern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC
Page 3 of 4
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
I, Michele Blount, certify that on March 1, 2017 the foregoing document(s) entitled:
4
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
ONLY
6
was filed electronically in the Court's ECF; thereby upon completion the ECF system
7
automatically generated a "Notice of Electronic Filing" ("NEF") as service through CM/ECF to
8
registered e-mail addressees of parties of record in the case.
9
10
11
12
Dated: March 1, 2017
By:
s/ Michele Blount_______
Michele Blount
Deos Law, PC
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC
Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?