Bellinder v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/2/17 ORDERING that all claims of Plaintiff Richard Bellinder against Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Plaintiff Richard Bellinder and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 4 Linda Deos, (SBN: 179170) Deos Law, PC 770 L Street, Suite 950 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 442-4442 (916) 583-7693 (Fax) Linda@deoslaw.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RICHARD BELLINDER, Case No: 2:16-cv-01289-JAM-AC 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY WELLS FARGO, N.A., ET AL. 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Richard Bellinder (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, and Defendant Equifax Information 17 18 Services, LLC (“Equifax”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein 19 between them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Equifax 20 only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ 21 fees. 22 Respectfully submitted, 23 Date: March 1, 2017 24 25 26 27 s/ Linda Deos Linda D. Deos, Esq. Deos Law, PC 770 L Street, Suite 950 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916-442-4442 Fax: 916-583-7693 E-Mail: linda@deoslaw.com 28 Counsel for Plaintiff Richard Bellinder STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 1 of 4 1 Date: March 1, 2017 2 3 4 5 s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. Thomas P. Quinn, Jr., Esq. Nokes & Quinn 410 Broadway, Suite 210 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Telephone: 949-376-3500 Fax: 949-376-3070 E-mail: tquinn@nokesquinn.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Date: March 1, 2017 s/ Kendall W. Carter Kendall W. Carter, Esq. King & Spalding, LLP 1180 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: 404-572-2495 Fax: 404-572-5100 E-Mail: kcarter@kslaw.com Counsel for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 2 of 4 1 ORDER 2 3 4 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff Richard Bellinder against Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC are dismissed, with 5 prejudice. Plaintiff Richard Bellinder and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall 6 each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 7 8 9 10 Date: March 2, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________ JUDGE, United States District Court, Eastern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 3 of 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 I, Michele Blount, certify that on March 1, 2017 the foregoing document(s) entitled: 4 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY 6 was filed electronically in the Court's ECF; thereby upon completion the ECF system 7 automatically generated a "Notice of Electronic Filing" ("NEF") as service through CM/ECF to 8 registered e-mail addressees of parties of record in the case. 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 1, 2017 By: s/ Michele Blount_______ Michele Blount Deos Law, PC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?