Bellinder v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/15/2017 ORDERING that all claims of Plaintiff Richard Bellinder against Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 4 Linda Deos, (SBN: 179170) Deos Law, PC 770 L Street, Suite 950 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 442-4442 (916) 583-7693 (Facsimile) Linda@deoslaw.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RICHARD BELLINDER, Case No: 2:16-cv-01289-JAM-AC 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A. ONLY WELLS FARGO, N.A., ET AL. Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Richard Bellinder (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, and Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. 18 (“Wells Fargo”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them 19 have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Wells Fargo only should 20 be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 21 22 23 24 25 26 Respectfully submitted, Date: November 15, 2017 s/ Linda Deos Linda D. Deos, Esq. Deos Law, PC 770 L Street, Suite 950 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916-442-4442 Facsimile: 916-583-7693 E-Mail: linda@deoslaw.com 27 Counsel for Plaintiff Richard Bellinder 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A. ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Date: November 15, 2017 s/ Jason Richardson Jason Richardson, Esq. Severson & Werson, P.C. One Embarcadero Center, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-398-3344 Facsimile: 415-956-0439 E-mail: jmr@severson.com Counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A. ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 2 of 4 1 ORDER 2 3 4 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff Richard Bellinder against Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff 5 Richard Bellinder and Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. shall each bear their own costs and 6 attorneys’ fees. 7 8 9 10 Date: November 15, 2017 /s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A. ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Michele Blount, certify that on November 15, 2017 the foregoing document(s) entitled: 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A. ONLY 5 was filed electronically in the Court's ECF; thereby upon completion the ECF system 6 automatically generated a "Notice of Electronic Filing" ("NEF") as service through CM/ECF to 7 registered e-mail addressees of parties of record in the case. 8 9 Dated: November 15, 2017 10 11 By: s/ Michele Blount_______ Michele Blount Deos Law, PC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A. ONLY – 2:16-CV-01289-JAM-AC Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?