Espindola v. Standard Insurance Company et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/2/2017 ORDERING dates set forth in the Court's 11/21/2016 Order are CONTINUED as follows: Plaintiff Dedra Espindola's motion for summary judgment in this ERISA matter sh all be filed by 6/9/2017; Defendant Standard Insurance Company's opposition and cross-motion shall be filed by 6/30/2017; Plaintiff's reply and opposition shall be filed by 7/21/2017; Defendant's reply shall be filed by 8/4/2017; Hearing on the parties' cross-motions is CONTINUED from 7/25/2017 at 1:30 p.m. to 8/22/2017 at 1:30 p.m. (Becknal, R)
1 Linda M. Lawson (Bar No. 77130)
llawson@mmhllp.com
2 Charles K. Chineduh (Bar No. 273258)
cchineduh@mmhllp.com
3 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP
800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
4 Los Angeles, California 90017-2611
Telephone: (213) 620-0300
5 Facsimile: (213) 625-1930
6 Attorneys for Defendant
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DEDRA ESPINDOLA,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01301-JAM-CKD
12
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DATES; ORDER THEREON
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY )
and DST SYSTEMS, INC., LONG TERM )
)
DISABILITY PLAN,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
17
Plaintiff Dedra Espindola (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Standard Insurance
18
19 Company (“Defendant” or “Standard”), currently the only named defendant in the
20 above-entitled action,1 by and through their respective attorneys of record, enter into
21 this stipulation based on the following facts:
22
On June 13, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this lawsuit.
23
On November 21, 2016, the Court issued a Minute Order (“November 21
24 Order”) (ECF Doc. No. 18), which indicated that the Court determined “this ERISA
25
26
1
Defendant DST Systems, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan was dismissed
without prejudice. See Order re Stipulation to Dismiss DST Systems, Inc., Long
27
Term Disability Plan, dated 08/10/16. (ECF Doc. No. 14.)
28
LAW OFFICES
1
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
156244.1
Case No. 2:16-cv-01301-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
1 matter should proceed on cross motions for summary judgment,” and which set forth
2 a schedule of pretrial and trial dates, including the following:
1.
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment: filed on or before May 12,
5
2.
Standard’s opposition and cross-motion: filed on or before June 2, 2017;
6
3.
Plaintiff’s reply and opposition: filed on or before June 23, 2017;
7
4.
Standard’s reply: filed on or before July 7, 2017;
8
5.
Hearing on cross-motions: July 25, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
9
On February 1, 2017, the parties participated in a mediation session before
3
4 2017;
10 Keith M. Parker, Esq., ADR Services, Inc.
The parties are continuing to actively explore settlement possibilities, and wish
11
12 to fully exhaust those possibilities prior to filing their respective cross-motions.
The parties have not previously requested the continuance of any dates set
13
14 forth in the November 21 Order.
WHEREAS, for good cause, for the convenience of the Court, and to conserve
15
16 both the Court’s and the parties’ time and resources while allowing the parties to
17 fully explore settlement possibilities, the parties stipulate to, and respectfully request,
18 a continuance of the following pretrial and trial dates set forth in the November 21
19 Order by 28 days, as set forth below.
20
STIPULATION
The parties agree and stipulate, and respectfully request, the following 28-day
21
22 continuances of dates set forth in the Court’s November 21, 2016 Order:
1.
23
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in this ERISA matter will be
24 filed on or before June 9, 2017;
2.
25
Standard’s opposition and cross-motion will be filed on or before
26 June 30, 2017;
27
3.
Plaintiff’s reply and opposition will be filed on or before July 21, 2017;
28
4.
Standard’s reply will be filed on or before August 4, 2017;
LAW OFFICES
2
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
156244.1
Case No. 2:16-cv-01301-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
5.
1
The hearing on the parties’ cross-motions is continued to August 22,
2 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED
4
5
6 Dated: May 1, 2017
7
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
Glenn R. Kantor
Alan E. Kassan
Brent Dorian Brehm
8
9
By: /s/ Brent Dorian Brehm
Brent Dorian Brehm
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEDRA ESPINDOLA
10
11
12
13 Dated: May 1, 2017
14
MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP
Linda M. Lawson
Charles K. Chineduh
15
By: /s/ Charles K. Chineduh
Charles K. Chineduh
Attorneys for Defendant
STANDARD INSURANCE
COMPANY
16
17
18
19
Filer’s Attestation-Local Rule 131(e)
20
The filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing
21
22 of this document and its content from the signatories to this document.
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
LAW OFFICES
3
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
156244.1
Case No. 2:16-cv-01301-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
1
ORDER
Based on the parties’ Stipulation and good cause appearing, the following
2
3 dates set forth in the Court’s November 21, 2016 Order are continued as follows:
1.
4
Plaintiff Dedra Espindola’s motion for summary judgment in this
5 ERISA matter shall be filed on or before June 9, 2017;
2.
6
Defendant Standard Insurance Company’s opposition and cross-motion
7 shall be filed on or before June 30, 2017;
8
3.
Plaintiff’s reply and opposition shall be filed on or before July 21, 2017;
9
4.
Defendant’s reply shall be filed on or before August 4, 2017;
10
5.
Hearing on the parties’ cross-motions is continued from July 25, 2017 at
11 1:30 p.m. to August 22, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 Dated: May 2, 2017
15
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Hon. John A Mendez
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
4
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
156244.1
Case No. 2:16-cv-01301-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?