Alford v. Kernan, et al.

Filing 22

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/28/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 3/13/13, are ADOPTED in full with respect to plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief; Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 3 is DENIED; and the matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID PATRICK ALFORD,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-CV-1305-GEB-CMK-P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42

17
18

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern

19

District of California local rules.
On March 13, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

20
21

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

22

objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have

23

been filed.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

25

304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

26

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

27

proper analysis with respect to plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. The court has not

28

considered the findings and recommendations with respect to dismissal of certain defendants for
1

1

failure to state a claim because plaintiff has filed amended complaints rendering the Magistrate

2

Judge’s analysis in this regard moot.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1.

5

The findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2013, are adopted in

full with respect to plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief;

6

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 3) is denied; and

7

3.

The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

8

Dated: September 28, 2017

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2