Barkley v. California Correctional Health Care Services, et al.

Filing 51

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/4/2018 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, the 45 order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JERMAINE BARKLEY,

11
12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-1386 MCE CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On December 18, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

18

judge’s order filed December 5, 2017, denying plaintiff’s motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D.

19

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

20

contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

21

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22
23
24
25

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
magistrate judge filed December 5, 2017, is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2018

26
27
28
1