Fordley v. Lizarraga, et al.

Filing 34

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/2017 ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING without prejudice 20 Motion to Dismiss. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN F. FORDLEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1387-JAM-EFB P

v.

ORDER

LIZARRAGA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 3, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2017, are adopted in full; and

27
28

/////
1

1
2

2. Defendants’ November 18, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20) is denied without
prejudice.

3

DATED: September 28, 2017

4

/s/ John A. Mendez_____________ _________

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

6

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2