Fordley v. Lizarraga, et al.

Filing 67

ORDER ADOPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/26/18; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's 43 Motion for TRO. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN FREDERICK FORDLEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1387-JAM-EFB P

v.

ORDER

JOE LIZARRAGA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 14, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

26

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

27

proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 14, 2018, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s December 4, 2017 motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 43) is

4

denied without prejudice.

5

So ordered.

6
7
8
9

DATED: April 26, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2