Mihan v. Regents of the University of California et al.

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/01/2016 ORDERING an extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint of Plaintiff is 8/15/2016. (Jackson, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
Nasim S. Tourkaman, SBN 300933
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (erroneously sued as UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS PLASTIC AND
RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY CENTER; and U.C. DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM DEPARTMENT
OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY)

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12

KIM MIHAN,

13
14

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01390-KJM-CMK
Plaintiff,

v.

15
16
17
18
19
20

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA; UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, DAVIS; UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA DAVIS PLASTIC AND
RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY CENTER;
U.C. DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY;
GREATER SACRAMENTO
OTOLARYNGOLOGY SOCIETY,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT REGENTS OF
THE
UNIVERSITY
OF
CALIFORNIA TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed:

06/21/2016

21
22

Defendants,
___________________________________/

23

Plaintiff KIM MIHAN and Defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

24

CALIFORNIA (erroneously sued as UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS; UNIVERSITY

25

OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY CENTER; U.C.

26

DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY) by and through their

27

respective counsel of record, hereby agree to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the

28

Complaint of Plaintiff to August 15, 2016.
{01584288.DOCX}

1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

1

Good cause exists for this extension. The parties have commenced the meet and confer

2

process in an attempt to avoid a Motion to Dismiss of the Complaint. Due to availability of

3

counsel and the contemplation of an amended Complaint, additional time is needed to explore the

4

issues. Thus, an extension of time for Defendant to respond to August 15, 2016 is necessary.

5
Respectfully Submitted,

6
7

Dated: July 28, 2016

PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

8
9

By:

10
11

/s/Carl L. Fessenden
Carl L. Fessenden (161494)
Attorneys for Defendant
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

Dated: July 28, 2016

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

14
By: Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV (authorized 07/28/16)
Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV (212970)
Attorney for Plaintiff KIM MIHAN

15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

Dated: August 1, 2016

20
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{01584288.DOCX}

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT