Stafford v. Doss et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/8/2019 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Doss, Ibarra, and Zuniga shall file an answer to plaintiff's first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH ANTHONY STAFFORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-CV-1403-JAM-DMC v. ORDER DOSS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. The matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On June 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 21 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 22 filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 14, 2019, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is denied; and 4 3. Defendants Doss, Ibarra, and Zuniga shall file an answer to plaintiff’s first 5 amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. 6 7 8 9 DATED: August 8, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?