Stafford v. Doss et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/8/2019 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Doss, Ibarra, and Zuniga shall file an answer to plaintiff's first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH ANTHONY STAFFORD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-CV-1403-JAM-DMC
v.
ORDER
DOSS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. The matter was
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On June 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
21
within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been
22
filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed June 14, 2019, are adopted in full;
3
2.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is denied; and
4
3.
Defendants Doss, Ibarra, and Zuniga shall file an answer to plaintiff’s first
5
amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.
6
7
8
9
DATED: August 8, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?