Stafford v. Doss et al
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/29/2021 STRIKING 64 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH ANTHONY STAFFORD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-CV-1403-JAM-DMC
v.
ORDER
DOSS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before
17
18
the Court is “Plaintiff’s Motion Request (sic) Denial of Defendant’s Motion of Summary
19
Judgment & Requests Summary Judgment in Plaintiff’s Favor.” See ECF No. 64.
To the extent Plaintiff seeks to oppose a motion for summary judgment filed by
20
21
Defendants, Plaintiff’s filing is premature because Defendants have not filed such a motion. To
22
the extent Plaintiff seeks summary judgment in his favor, Plaintiff’s motion is defective for
23
failure to comply with Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(b), which requires that
24
motions be noticed for hearing on the appropriate Judge’s calendar. Plaintiff’s motion is also
25
defective for failure to comply with Local Rule 260(a), which requires motions for summary
26
judgment to be accompanied by a statement of undisputed facts.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s filing at ECF No. 64 is
stricken.
3
4
5
Dated: January 29, 2021
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?