Stafford v. Doss et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/29/2021 STRIKING 64 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH ANTHONY STAFFORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-CV-1403-JAM-DMC v. ORDER DOSS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before 17 18 the Court is “Plaintiff’s Motion Request (sic) Denial of Defendant’s Motion of Summary 19 Judgment & Requests Summary Judgment in Plaintiff’s Favor.” See ECF No. 64. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to oppose a motion for summary judgment filed by 20 21 Defendants, Plaintiff’s filing is premature because Defendants have not filed such a motion. To 22 the extent Plaintiff seeks summary judgment in his favor, Plaintiff’s motion is defective for 23 failure to comply with Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(b), which requires that 24 motions be noticed for hearing on the appropriate Judge’s calendar. Plaintiff’s motion is also 25 defective for failure to comply with Local Rule 260(a), which requires motions for summary 26 judgment to be accompanied by a statement of undisputed facts. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s filing at ECF No. 64 is stricken. 3 4 5 Dated: January 29, 2021 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?