Stafford v. Doss et al

Filing 83

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/06/21 SETTING Settlement Conference set for 2/16/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. Confidential settlement conference statements due to Judge Peterson by 02/09/22. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSEPH ANTHONY STAFFORD,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
DOSS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

Case No. 2:16-cv-01403-JAM-DMC (PS)
ORDER (1) SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE, (2) REQUIRING PERSONAL
ATTENDANCE BY CERTAIN
INDIVIDUALS, AND (3) REQUIRING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
STATEMENT MEETING CERTAIN
PARAMETERS

16
17

Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson will hold a settlement conference by Zoom on

18

February 16, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. The court expects that the parties will proceed with the

19

settlement conference in good faith and attempt to resolve all or part of the case. If any party

20

believes that the settlement conference will not be productive, that party shall so inform the court

21

as far in advance of the settlement conference as possible. Unless otherwise permitted in advance

22

by the court, the following individuals must attend the settlement conference: (1) all of the

23

attorney(s) who will try the case; and (2) individuals with full authority to negotiate and settle the

24

case, on any terms.

25

No later than one week prior to the settlement conference, each party must submit to

26

Judge Peterson’s chambers at [e-mail], or by mail at U.S. District Court,

27

501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, a confidential settlement conference statement. These

28

statements should neither be filed on the docket nor served on any other party. The statements
1

1

should be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” and should state the date and time of the conference. The

2

statements should not be lengthy but should include:

3

(1) a brief recitation of the facts;

4

(2) a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case;

5

(3) an itemized estimate of the expected costs for further discovery, pretrial, and trial

6

matters, in specific dollar terms;

7
8

(4) your best estimate of the probability that plaintiff will obtain a finding of liability
should this case proceed to trial, in percentage terms;

9
10

(5) should this case proceed to trial and defendant be found liable, please provide the
following, in specific dollar terms:

11
12

(a) a realistic high-end recovery estimate (i.e., realistic best- or worst-case
scenario);

13
14

(b) a realistic low-end recovery estimate (i.e., realistic worst- or best-case
scenario); and

15

(c) a best estimate of the most likely outcome;

16

(6) a history of settlement discussions, including:

17

(a) a statement of your expectations for settlement discussions;

18

(b) a listing of any past and present settlement offers from any party (including all

19

terms);

20
21

(c) whether your party would consider making the opening offer or demand, and
what that offer might be1;

22
23

(7) a list of the individuals who will be participating in the settlement conference on your
party’s behalf, including each participant’s name and, if appropriate, title; and

24
25

(8) identification of any related cases or of any other cases that the parties might wish to
discuss at this settlement conference.

26
27
28

1

Please note that Judge Peterson will consider this response, among others, in evaluating
whether proceeding with a settlement conference appears worthwhile.
2

1

In accordance with the above, it is hereby ORDERED that:

2

1. A settlement conference is set before Magistrate Judge Peterson on February 16, 2022,

3
4
5

at 10:00 a.m.
2. No later than February 9, 2022, each party must submit a confidential settlement
conference statement, as described above, to Magistrate Judge Peterson.

6
7
8

Dated: December 6, 2021

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3