Jensen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/11/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff's opening brief is due on 2/6/2017. The Court's 6 Scheduling Order is modified accordingly. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 KELSEY BROWN, CA #263109 Mackenzie Legal, PLLC 1003 Whitman Street Tacoma, WA 98406 (206) 300-9063 Email: kelsey@mackenzielegal.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACREMENTO DIVISION 10 11 KEVIN JENSEN, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. Case # 2:16-CV-01428-KJN ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION TO FILE PL’S MSJ COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 15 Defendant. 16 The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, Plaintiff shall have a first 30-day extension of 17 time to file Plaintiff’s opening brief, in accordance with the scheduling order. Plaintiff’s counsel 18 has a heavy caseload at this time and has three briefs due on the same day. Counsel is a solo 19 practitioner and has no other attorneys to help with this caseload at this time. The Opening Brief 20 shall now be due on February 6, 2017. The parties stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 1 1 Dated January 6, 2017: /s/ Kelsey M Brown KELSEY MACKENZIE BROWN CA #263109 Mackenzie Legal, PLLC 1003 Whitman Street Tacoma, WA 98406 (206) 300-9063 Attorney for Plaintiff Dated January 6, 2017: s/ KELSEY M. BROWN for Sharon Lahey SHARON LAHEY (per e-mail authorization) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Of Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 ORDER The Court APPROVES the parties’ stipulation as outlined above. Plaintiff’s opening brief 12 13 is due on February 6, 2017. The Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF No. 6) is modified accordingly. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: January 11, 2017 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?