Griffin v. Dowilliams et al

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/19/2019 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, the 88 Order is AFFIRMED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES E. GRIFFIN, II,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.

No. 2:16-cv-1435 WBS CKD P

ORDER

DOROTHY DO-WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On July 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s June 19, 2019 order (ECF No. 88). Pursuant to E.D.

19

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

20

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

21

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

23

magistrate judge filed June 19, 2019 (ECF No. 88), is affirmed.

24

Dated: July 19, 2019

25
26
27
28

1

grif1435.850

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2