Griffin v. Dowilliams et al
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/19/2019 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, the 88 Order is AFFIRMED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES E. GRIFFIN, II,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:16-cv-1435 WBS CKD P
ORDER
DOROTHY DO-WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On July 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for
18
reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s June 19, 2019 order (ECF No. 88). Pursuant to E.D.
19
Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or
20
contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the
21
magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
22
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
23
magistrate judge filed June 19, 2019 (ECF No. 88), is affirmed.
24
Dated: July 19, 2019
25
26
27
28
1
grif1435.850
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?