Hussein v. K2M, Inc.
Filing
32
ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/29/17, ORDERING that plaintiff's 24 motion is GRANTED in part. By no later than 7/19/2017, defendant shall serve its responsesto all outstanding discovery and provide plaintiff available deposition dates and the names of the three Rule 30(b)(6) deponents. Thereafter, the parties shall expeditiously complete those depositions. The deadline for designating experts is EXTENDED to 7/25/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NASIR HUSSEIN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-1446-KJM-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AFTER HEARING
K2M, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
DOES 1-20 inclusive,
Defendants.
16
17
18
This case was before the court on June 28, 2017, for hearing on plaintiff’s motion to
19
modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 24. Attorney Shahid Manzoor appeared on behalf of
20
plaintiff and attorney Genese Dopson appeared on behalf of defendant.
21
22
23
For the reasons stated on the record, and good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion is
granted in part and the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is modified as follows:
1. The discovery deadline is extended for the limited purpose of permitting defendant to
24
respond to all discovery requests previously served by plaintiff and allowing plaintiff to complete
25
three Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. By no later than July 19, 2017, defendant shall serve its responses
26
to all outstanding discovery and provide plaintiff available deposition dates and the names of the
27
three Rule 30(b)(6) deponents. Thereafter, the parties shall expeditiously complete those
28
depositions.
1
1
2. The deadline for designating experts is extended from July 10, 2017 to July 25, 2017.
2
So Ordered.
3
DATED: June 29, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?