Drobish v. City of Citrus Heights

Filing 20

JUDGMENT AND ORDER dated *4/12/2017* pursuant to order, signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/11/2017 re: Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO

10
11

JESSICA DROBISH, on behalf of
herself and all similarly situated
individuals,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No.: 2:16-cv-01460-WBS-CKD
Complaint Filed: June 27, 2016
JUDGMENT AND ORDER RE: APPROVAL
OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

15

Defendant.

16
17

[Filed concurrently with Joint Stipulation and
Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement and
Dismissal with Prejudice; Declaration of Lisa S.
Charbonneau; Declaration of David E. Mastagni;
Declaration of Ronda Rivera]

18
19

Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement

20

and Dismissal with Prejudice jointly submitted by Plaintiffs Jessica Drobish et al. and Defendant

21

City of Citrus Heights (“Parties”) , the evidence submitted in support therewith, and all other

22

materials of record relevant to this matter, and for good cause shown,

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

24

The Settlement Agreement submitted to the Court as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Lisa

25

S. Charbonneau, is approved as a fair and just negotiated resolution of the bona fide dispute

26

between the Parties in this case, and the Parties shall fully abide by and perform the Settlement

27

Agreement in its entirety and accordance with its terms.

28

//

30
31

1
[Proposed] Order Granting Joint Stipulation and Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal
8095990.1 CI060-026

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED THAT:

2

A.

3
4

The Court reserves jurisdiction over the above-captioned matter for purposes of

enforcing the Settlement Agreement only;
B.

The Court has made no findings or determination regarding the law, and none of

5

the materials or documents prepared or submitted in support of the Parties’ Joint Request for

6

Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice shall constitute evidence of, or any

7

admission of, any violation of law;

8
9

C.

Judgment is entered in this action, and this action is dismissed WITH

PREJUDICE.

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 11, 2017

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

2
[Proposed] Order Granting Joint Stipulation and Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal
8095990.1 CI060-026