King v. Davey

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/5/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 34 motion is DENIED as moot. Defendants need not inquire into the status of plaintiff's access to his legal property as directed in the 4/19/2017 order. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JERRY LEE KING, 11 No. 2:16-cv-1464-WBS-EFB P Petitioner, 12 v. 13 DAVE DAVEY, 14 ORDER Respondent. 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 28 16 17 U.S.C. § 2254. He filed a motion alleging that the property officer at his institution of 18 incarceration refused to provide him his legal property without an order from the court directing 19 him to do so. ECF No. 34. The court directed counsel for defendants to inquire into the status of 20 plaintiff’s access to his legal property. ECF No. 41. Before the time for responding to that order 21 passed, plaintiff filed a notice informing the court that he had been provided with his legal 22 property and access to the law library. ECF No. 42. Defendants then notified the court that they 23 would comply with the court’s order if the court deemed it necessary in light of plaintiff’s notice. 24 ECF No. 43. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Because plaintiff’s April 26, 2017 notice makes clear that he has been provided with his 2 legal property, his February 8, 2017 motion (ECF No. 34) is DENIED as moot. Defendants need 3 not inquire into the status of plaintiff’s access to his legal property as directed in the April 19, 4 2017 order (ECF No. 41). 5 DATED: July 5, 2017. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?