Carlson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/1/17 ORDERING that plaintiff may have an extension of time to 3/1/2017 to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to 3/31/2017 to file his opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due 4/21/2017. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail _steven.rosales@rohlfinglaw.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN R. CARLSON 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 STEVEN R. CARLSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 15 Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant 17 ) Case No.: 2:16-CV-01484 CKD ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE HONORABLE CAROLYN K. DELANEY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: Plaintiff Steven R. Carlson (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand to March 1, 2017; and that Defendant shall have until March 31, 2017, to file his opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will be due April 21, 2017. -1- 1 An extension of time for plaintiff is needed. As the Court is aware, 2 Plaintiff’s Spouse recently passed away. Due to the press of the holidays and the 3 need to find a caregiver and the required time to acclimate his children to his 4 absence to meet his professional obligations, Counsel requires the additional time 5 to prepare and file his Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand. 6 7 Counsel sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may have had upon it or its staff. 8 DATE: January 30, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 9 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 10 /s/ Steven G. Rosales BY: _________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff 11 12 13 DATED: January 30, 2017 14 BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney 15 16 17 18 19 20 */S/- Sundeep Patel _________________________________ Sundeep Patel Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant [*Via email authorization] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may have an extension of time, to 2 and including March 1, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 3 Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to March 31, 2017 4 to file his opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due 5 April 21, 2017. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: February 1, 2017 8 9 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?