Winkle v. County of Modoc

Filing 5

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/16 ORDERING that Defendant County of Modoc's responsive pleading is now DUE on or before 9/16/2016. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5

PRENTICE, LONG & EPPERSON, PC
MARGARET LONG, SBN 227176
1716 Court Street, Suite B
Redding, California 96001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for County of Modoc

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

JULIE WINKLE, on behalf of herself and
all similarly situated individuals,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12

COUNTY OF MODOC,
Defendant.

14

16
17

STIPULATION TO EXTEND
RESPONSE

v.

13

15

Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-01486KJM-GGH

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-referenced
matter that Defendant County of Modoc has up to and including September 16, 2016 to
respond to the Complaint for Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Dated: August 22, 2016

18
19

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT APC

20
21

By: _____________________________________
DAVID E. MASTAGNI
Attorneys for Plaintiff

22
23

Dated August 22, 2016

24

PRENTICE, LONG & EPPERSON, PC

25
By: _____________________________________
MARGARET E. LONG
Attorneys for Defendant
County of Modoc

26
27
28
00009722.1

1
ANSWER OF COUNTY OF MODOC TO COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF WINKLE

1
2
3
4

ORDER
Per the above-stipulation, Defendant County of Modoc’s responsive pleading in this
matter is now due on or before September 16, 2016.
Dated: August 30, 2016

5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00009722.1

2
ANSWER OF COUNTY OF MODOC TO COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF WINKLE