Hoffman v. County of Butte

Filing 100

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/15/17 ORDERING that the 8/29/17 Discovery cut off is CONTINUED for 90 days, or to 11/27/2017. The expert disclosure date is continued to 60 days after 11/27/17. The supplemental expert disclosure date is continued to 90 days after 11/27/17. The dispositive motion cut-off is continued to 180 days from the new discovery cutoff of 11/27/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244) ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245) ACE T. TATE, ESQ. (SBN 262015) MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT A Professional Corporation 1912 “I” Street Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: (916) 446-4692 Facsimile: (916) 447-4614 davidm@mastagni.com istevens@mastagni.com atate@mastagni.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MORIN I. JACOB, ESQ. (SBN 204598) RICHARD C. BOLANOS, ESQ. (SBN 111343) LISA S. CHARBONNEAU, ESQ. (SBN 245906) LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 135 Main Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 512-3000 Facsimile: (415) 856-0306 rbolanos@lcwlegal.com mjacob@lcwlegal.com lcharbonneau@lcwlegal.com Attorneys for Defendant 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO 20 DEBRA HOFFMAN on behalf of herself and all similarly situated individuals, 21 22 23 24 Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE, Case No.: 2:16-cv-01487-MCE-AC Complaint Filed: June 30, 2016 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND RELATED DEADLINES FOR GOOD CAUSE Defendant. 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs DEBRA HOFFMAN, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant COUNTY OF BUTTE (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, this putative collective action was filed on June 30, 2016, asserting that 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Cutoff 1 2 Defendant violated the overtime payment provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”); WHEREAS, On May 25, 2017 the Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Gregory 3 G. Hollows for settlement conference, and continued the discovery cutoff to August 29, 2017, as 4 requested by counsel. 5 WHEREAS, the parties are working diligently towards settlement of all issues in this case. 6 The parties desire additional time to exhaust settlement efforts before engaging in further 7 litigation and trial preparation. 8 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and respectfully submit that: 9 Good cause exists to continue the August 29, 2017 discovery cut off for 90 days, or to 10 November 27, 2017; continue the expert disclosure date to 60 days after November 27, 2017; 11 continue the supplemental expert disclosure date to 90 days after November 27, 2017; and 12 continue the dispositive motion cut-off to 180 days from the new discovery cutoff of November 13 27, 2017. 14 15 Dated: August 14, 2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 16 17 By: /s/ Lisa S. Charbonneau MORIN I. JACOB, ESQ. RICHARD C. BOLANOS, ESQ. LISA S. CHARBONNEAU, ESQ Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 20 21 Dated: August 14, 2017 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ David E. Mastagni DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. ACE T. TATE, ESQ. IAN SANGSTER, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 27 28 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Cutoff 1 ORDER 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based on the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, that: The August 29, 2017 discovery cut off is continued for 90 days, or to November 27, 2017. 5 The expert disclosure date is continued to 60 days after November 27, 2017. The supplemental 6 expert disclosure date is continued to 90 days after November 27, 2017. The dispositive motion 7 cut-off is continued to 180 days from the new discovery cutoff of November 27, 2017. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: August 15, 2017 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Cutoff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?