United States of America v. LaPant et al

Filing 140

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/10/2020 AMENDING the schedule as follows: Reply briefs to 113 and 121 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 6/12/2020, 113 and 121 Motion Hearings are set for 6/26/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and the Joint Pretrial Statement is due 8/7/2020. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 5 ANDREW J. DOYLE JOHN THOMAS H. DO ANDREW S. COGHLAN United States Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 514-4427 / Fax: (202) 514-8865 6 Attorneys for the United States 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON THERESE Y. CANNATA MARK P. FICKES 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.409.8900 / Facsimile: 415.409.8904 Attorneys for Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 2:16-cv-001498-KJM-DB 15 16 17 18 19 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROGER J. LAPANT, JR., SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES AND S.J. HEARING Defendant. 21 22 23 Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. have met and 24 conferred and hereby stipulate and propose for the Court’s approval a further extension of 25 deadlines and the summary judgment hearing date. Specifically: 26 27 28 1. On February 12, 2020, the parties appeared before The Honorable Kendall J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge, for a settlement conference. 2. As noted in the minutes from the settlement conference (ECF No. 134), progress Stipulation/Order for Extension of Deadlines/S.J. Hearing 1 2 3 4 was made, and a further settlement conference occurred via teleconference on March 9, 2020. 3. Since March 9, 2020, Judge Newman has regularly spoken with the parties, and, through him, the parties have exchanged settlement-related information and communications. 4. Currently, as set forth in the Stipulation and Order dated February 21, 2020 (ECF 5 No. 136), reply briefs associated with cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 113 & 121) 6 are due April 10, 2020, and a hearing is scheduled for April 24, 2020. 7 5. To allow the parties to focus their attention and resources toward settlement 8 efforts, the parties stipulate and propose for the Court’s approval a further extension of the 9 deadline for reply briefs from April 10 to June 12, 2020. 10 11 12 13 14 15 5. Likewise, the parties stipulate and propose for the Court’s approval a further extension of the summary judgment hearing date from April 24 to June 26, 2020. 6. And the parties stipulate and propose for the Court’s approval a parallel extension of the deadline for the Joint Pretrial Statement from June 5 to August 7, 2020. Dated: April 6, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 18 /s/ Andrew J. Doyle United States Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 514-4427 19 Attorney for the United States 16 17 20 21 22 CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON LLP /s/ Therese Y. Cannata THERESE Y. CANNATA Attorneys for Defendant ROGER J. LAPANT, Jr. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation/Order for Extension of Deadlines/S.J. Hearing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER Upon due consideration, the Court approves the foregoing stipulation and amends the schedule as follows: (1) Reply briefs associated with cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 113 & 121) are now due June 12, 2020. (2) The hearing date for the cross motions for summary judgment is now June 26, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (3) The Joint Pretrial Statement is now due August 7, 2020. 9 10 DATED: April 10, 2020. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation/Order for Extension of Deadlines/S.J. Hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?