United States of America v. LaPant et al

Filing 146

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/10/2020. Case RELATED to 2:19-cv-02631-KJM-DB. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GOOSE POND AG, INC., 12 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-02631-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. DUARTE NURSERY, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ___________________________________ 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 18 19 20 21 No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB Plaintiff, RELATED CASE ORDER v. ROGER J. LaPANT, JR., et al., Defendants. 22 23 24 Examination of the above-captioned actions reveals that they are related within the 25 meaning of Local Rule 123(a). Here, “both actions involve the same parties and are based on the 26 same or a similar claim,” “involve the same property,” and relation “is likely to effect a 27 substantial savings of judicial effort” and “would entail substantial duplication of labor if the 28 1 1 actions were heard by different Judges or Magistrate Judges.” Local Rule 123(a)(1)–(4). 2 Accordingly, relating these matters is proper. 3 The parties should be aware that relating cases under Rule 123 causes the actions 4 to be assigned to the same judge – it does not consolidate the actions. Under Rule 123, related 5 cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was 6 assigned. 7 As a result, it is hereby ORDERED that 2:19-cv-02631-KJM-AC is reassigned 8 from Magistrate Judge Alison Claire to Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Henceforth, the 9 caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as: 2:19-cv-02631-KJM-DB. 10 11 12 13 It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 10, 2020. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?