United States of America v. LaPant et al

Filing 155

SIXTH STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/2020 AMENDING the schedule as follows: Reply briefs associated with cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 113 and 121 are now due 11/24/2020. The hearing date for the cross motions for summary judgment is RESET for 12/11/2020, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The Joint Pretrial Statement REMAINS on 2/5/20201. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 4 CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON THERESE Y. CANNATA MARK P. FICKES ZACHARY E. COLBETH 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 409.8900 / Fax: (415) 409-8904 5 Attorneys for Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. 2 3 6 7 11 ANDREW J. DOYLE JOHN THOMAS H. DO ANDREW S. COGHLAN United States Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 514-4427 / Fax: (202) 514-8865 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROGER J. LAPANT, JR., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB SIXTH STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES AND S.J. HEARING 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and PO for Extension of Deadlines Case No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 1 Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. have met and 2 conferred and hereby stipulate and propose for the Court’s approval an extension of deadlines 3 and the summary judgment hearing date. Specifically: 4 5 1. Honorable Kendall J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge, for settlement conferences. 6 7 2. Since the most recent settlement conference on September 23, the parties have made substantial progress. 8 9 Beginning February 12, 2020, the parties have been appearing before The 3. Indeed, the parties have nearly completed edits to a draft proposed consent decree and settlement agreement and accompanying appendices. 10 4. Currently, as set forth in the Minute Order dated September 4, 2020 (ECF No. 11 12 13 150), reply briefs associated with cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 113 & 121) are due October 28, 2020. 5. 14 15 16 propose for the Court’s approval an extension of the deadline for reply briefs from October 28 to November 24, 2020. 6. 17 18 To allow the parties to complete their settlement efforts, the parties stipulate and Likewise, the parties stipulate and propose for the Court’s approval an extension of the summary judgment hearing date from November 6 to December 11, 2020. 7. 19 At this time, the parties do not propose any change to the deadline for the Joint 20 Pretrial Statement (February 5, 2021). 21 // 22 // 23 Dated: October 16, 2020 24 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Therese Y. Cannata CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 409-8900 25 26 27 Attorney for Roger J. LaPant, Jr. 28 /s/ Andrew J. Doyle United States Department of Justice Stipulation and PO for Extension of Deadlines No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 1 1 Environmental and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 514-4427 2 3 Attorney for the United States 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and PO for Extension of Deadlines No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER Upon due consideration, the Court approves the foregoing stipulation and amends the schedule as follows: (1) Reply briefs associated with cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 113 & 121) are now due November 24, 2020. (2) The hearing date for the cross motions for summary judgment is reset for December 11, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (3) The Joint Pretrial Statement remains due February 5, 2021. 9 10 Dated: October 19, 2020. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and PO for Extension of Deadlines No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?