United States of America v. LaPant et al

Filing 161

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/11/21 ORDERING that the Court approves the foregoing stipulation and stays all further proceedings in this case, including deadlines respecting the parties' pending cross-motions for summary judgment 113 & 121 . (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 4 CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON THERESE Y. CANNATA MARK P. FICKES ZACHARY E. COLBETH 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 409.8900 / Fax: (415) 409-8904 5 Attorneys for Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. 2 3 6 7 11 ANDREW J. DOYLE JOHN THOMAS H. DO ANDREW S. COGHLAN United States Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 514-4427 / Fax: (202) 514-8865 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROGER J. LAPANT, JR., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR STAY 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order for Stay Case No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 1 Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. hereby stipulate 2 and propose for the Court’s approval a stay of all further proceedings in this case. The parties 3 have completed their settlement negotiations and, on December 30, 2020, Mr. LaPant signed a 4 final draft proposed Consent Decree and Settlement (“CD,” for shorthand). The United States is 5 expected to complete its review of the CD by January 19, 2021. Provided that the CD is lodged 6 7 8 9 with the Court by the same date (January 19), as expected, a public comment period would follow. And following the public comment period, which lasts 30 days from the publication of a notice in the Federal Register, the United States would file an appropriate motion respecting the CD (e.g., a motion to enter the CD). 10 However, if a proposed Consent Decree and Settlement is not lodged with the Court by 11 12 13 14 15 January 19, 2021, the parties would file, by January 28, 2021, a stipulation (or, if no stipulation can be reached, a joint status report) regarding their proposal(s) for the governance of further proceedings, including the parties’ pending cross-motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 113 & 121. 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 Dated: January 8, 2021 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Therese Y. Cannata CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 409-8900 20 21 22 23 Attorney for Roger J. LaPant, Jr. 24 /s/ Andrew J. Doyle United States Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division Tel: (202) 532-3156 25 26 27 Attorney for the United States 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order for Stay No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 1 1 STAY ORDER 2 Upon due consideration, the Court approves the foregoing stipulation and stays all 3 further proceedings in this case, including deadlines respecting the parties’ pending cross- 4 motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 113 & 121. 5 6 7 8 9 If a proposed Consent Decree and Settlement is lodged with the Court by January 19, 2021, the stay shall extend through the public comment period and the Court’s resolution of any motion filed by the United States following the conclusion of the public comment period (e.g., a motion to enter the proposed Consent Decree and Settlement). If a proposed Consent Decree is not lodged with the Court by January 19, 2021, the 10 parties shall file, by January 28, 2021, a stipulation (or, if no stipulation can be reached, a joint 11 12 status report) regarding their proposal(s) for the governance of further proceedings in this case. 13 14 Dated: January 11, 2021. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order for Stay No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?