United States of America v. LaPant et al
Filing
161
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/11/21 ORDERING that the Court approves the foregoing stipulation and stays all further proceedings in this case, including deadlines respecting the parties' pending cross-motions for summary judgment 113 & 121 . (Kaminski, H)
1
4
CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON
THERESE Y. CANNATA
MARK P. FICKES
ZACHARY E. COLBETH
100 Pine Street, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 409.8900 / Fax: (415) 409-8904
5
Attorneys for Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr.
2
3
6
7
11
ANDREW J. DOYLE
JOHN THOMAS H. DO
ANDREW S. COGHLAN
United States Department of Justice
Environmental and Natural Resources Division
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044
Telephone: (202) 514-4427 / Fax: (202) 514-8865
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff United States
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROGER J. LAPANT, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB
STIPULATION AND
ORDER FOR STAY
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order for Stay
Case No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB
1
Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Roger J. LaPant, Jr. hereby stipulate
2
and propose for the Court’s approval a stay of all further proceedings in this case. The parties
3
have completed their settlement negotiations and, on December 30, 2020, Mr. LaPant signed a
4
final draft proposed Consent Decree and Settlement (“CD,” for shorthand). The United States is
5
expected to complete its review of the CD by January 19, 2021. Provided that the CD is lodged
6
7
8
9
with the Court by the same date (January 19), as expected, a public comment period would
follow. And following the public comment period, which lasts 30 days from the publication of
a notice in the Federal Register, the United States would file an appropriate motion respecting
the CD (e.g., a motion to enter the CD).
10
However, if a proposed Consent Decree and Settlement is not lodged with the Court by
11
12
13
14
15
January 19, 2021, the parties would file, by January 28, 2021, a stipulation (or, if no stipulation
can be reached, a joint status report) regarding their proposal(s) for the governance of further
proceedings, including the parties’ pending cross-motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos.
113 & 121.
16
//
17
//
18
//
19
Dated: January 8, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Therese Y. Cannata
CANNATA, O’TOOLE, FICKES & OLSON LLP
100 Pine Street, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 409-8900
20
21
22
23
Attorney for Roger J. LaPant, Jr.
24
/s/ Andrew J. Doyle
United States Department of Justice
Environmental and Natural Resources Division
Tel: (202) 532-3156
25
26
27
Attorney for the United States
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order for Stay
No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB
1
1
STAY ORDER
2
Upon due consideration, the Court approves the foregoing stipulation and stays all
3
further proceedings in this case, including deadlines respecting the parties’ pending cross-
4
motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 113 & 121.
5
6
7
8
9
If a proposed Consent Decree and Settlement is lodged with the Court by January 19,
2021, the stay shall extend through the public comment period and the Court’s resolution of any
motion filed by the United States following the conclusion of the public comment period (e.g., a
motion to enter the proposed Consent Decree and Settlement).
If a proposed Consent Decree is not lodged with the Court by January 19, 2021, the
10
parties shall file, by January 28, 2021, a stipulation (or, if no stipulation can be reached, a joint
11
12
status report) regarding their proposal(s) for the governance of further proceedings in this case.
13
14
Dated: January 11, 2021.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order for Stay
No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?