Swanson v. Keystone RV Company, Inc. et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/12/2016 ORDERING that the parties' agreement regarding discovery is APPROVED. This matter is referred to the court's ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in January 2017. A principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear at the VDRP session. If the case does not settle at the VDRP session, the parties are directed to file the joint initial scheduling report required by this court's standing order by 2/23/2017. This case is set for an initial scheduling status conference on 3/2/2017, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM L. BAKER William L. Baker (State Bar #114454) 1050 Fulton Avenue, Suite 218 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 978-0772 Facsimile: (916) 481-5080 Attorney for Defendants KEYSTONE RV COMPANY and JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba FUN CARS/TOY HAULER LIQUIDATORS 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) Plaintiff ) v. ) ) KEYSTONE RV COMPANY, INC., a corporation; ) and JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC., a ) corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________________ ) MERVIN SWANSON, an individual, Case No: 2:16-CV-01512-KJM-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO VDRP [L.R.271(i)] 17 18 Plaintiff MERVIN SWANSON and Defendants KEYSTONE RV COMPANY and 19 Defendant JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba FUN CARS/TOY HAULER 20 LIQUIDATORS, enter into the following stipulation: 1. The Parties agree to refer this dispute to the Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution 21 22 Program [hereinafter “VDRP”] pursuant to Local Rule 271. 23 2. The VDRP process shall be completed by the Parties on or before January 20, 2017 24 and the Neutral shall file confirmation of completion of the process no later than January 31, 25 2017. 26 3. The Parties may propound Interrogatories or Requests for Production of Documents 27 during the time the case is referred to VDRP and Defendants may also serve a Request for 28 Inspection regarding the Travel Trailer that is the subject matter of the dispute while the case is 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO VDRP 1 referred to VDRP. All other discovery shall be stayed until after completion of the VDRP 2 process. 3 4 Dated: October 6, 2016 TERRY L. BAKER 5 By: /s/ Terry L. Baker (as authorized on October 6, 2016 TERRY L. BAKER, SBN 214365 Counsel for Plaintiff MERVIN SWANSON 6 7 8 9 Dated: October 6, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM L. BAKER 10 By: /s/ William L. Baker WILLIAM L. BAKER, SBN 114454 Counsel for Defendants KEYSTONE RV COMPANY, INC. and JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba FUN CARS/TOY HAULER LIQUIDATORS 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 The parties’ agreement regarding discovery is APPROVED. This matter is referred to 18 the court’s ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in 19 January 2017. A principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear at the VDRP 20 session. 21 22 The parties are reminded to promptly notify the court if they settle this case prior to the scheduled VDRP conference date. 23 If the case does not settle at the VDRP session, the parties are directed to file the joint 24 initial scheduling report required by this court’s standing order by February 23, 2017. This case 25 is set for an initial scheduling status conference on March 2, 2017, at 2:30 p.m. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 12, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO VDRP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?