Swanson v. Keystone RV Company, Inc. et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/12/2016 ORDERING that the parties' agreement regarding discovery is APPROVED. This matter is referred to the court's ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in January 2017. A principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear at the VDRP session. If the case does not settle at the VDRP session, the parties are directed to file the joint initial scheduling report required by this court's standing order by 2/23/2017. This case is set for an initial scheduling status conference on 3/2/2017, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM L. BAKER
William L. Baker (State Bar #114454)
1050 Fulton Avenue, Suite 218
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 978-0772
Facsimile: (916) 481-5080
Attorney for Defendants KEYSTONE
RV COMPANY and JAMES B. TUCK
ENTERPRISES, INC. dba FUN CARS/TOY
HAULER LIQUIDATORS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff
)
v.
)
)
KEYSTONE RV COMPANY, INC., a corporation; )
and JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC., a
)
corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________________ )
MERVIN SWANSON, an individual,
Case No: 2:16-CV-01512-KJM-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
REFERRAL TO VDRP
[L.R.271(i)]
17
18
Plaintiff MERVIN SWANSON and Defendants KEYSTONE RV COMPANY and
19
Defendant JAMES B. TUCK ENTERPRISES, INC. dba FUN CARS/TOY HAULER
20
LIQUIDATORS, enter into the following stipulation:
1. The Parties agree to refer this dispute to the Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution
21
22
Program [hereinafter “VDRP”] pursuant to Local Rule 271.
23
2. The VDRP process shall be completed by the Parties on or before January 20, 2017
24
and the Neutral shall file confirmation of completion of the process no later than January 31,
25
2017.
26
3. The Parties may propound Interrogatories or Requests for Production of Documents
27
during the time the case is referred to VDRP and Defendants may also serve a Request for
28
Inspection regarding the Travel Trailer that is the subject matter of the dispute while the case is
1
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO VDRP
1
referred to VDRP. All other discovery shall be stayed until after completion of the VDRP
2
process.
3
4
Dated: October 6, 2016
TERRY L. BAKER
5
By: /s/ Terry L. Baker (as authorized on
October 6, 2016
TERRY L. BAKER, SBN 214365
Counsel for Plaintiff MERVIN
SWANSON
6
7
8
9
Dated: October 6, 2016
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM L. BAKER
10
By: /s/ William L. Baker
WILLIAM L. BAKER, SBN 114454
Counsel for Defendants KEYSTONE RV
COMPANY, INC. and JAMES B. TUCK
ENTERPRISES, INC. dba FUN
CARS/TOY HAULER LIQUIDATORS
11
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
The parties’ agreement regarding discovery is APPROVED. This matter is referred to
18
the court’s ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in
19
January 2017. A principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear at the VDRP
20
session.
21
22
The parties are reminded to promptly notify the court if they settle this case prior to the
scheduled VDRP conference date.
23
If the case does not settle at the VDRP session, the parties are directed to file the joint
24
initial scheduling report required by this court’s standing order by February 23, 2017. This case
25
is set for an initial scheduling status conference on March 2, 2017, at 2:30 p.m.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 12, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
2
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO VDRP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?