Barker et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/27/2017 ORDERING Discovery cut-off for the limited purpose of resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs' challenged discovery responses is EXTENDED to 11/10/2017. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Eastern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Christopher C. McNatt, Jr. (SBN 174559) cmcnatt@scopelitis.com SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, LLP 2 North Lake Avenue, Suite 560 Pasadena, CA 91101 Tel: (626) 795-4700 Fax: (626) 795-4790 Adam C. Smedstad (SBN 303591) asmedstad@scopelitis.com Andrew J. Butcher (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) abutcher@scopelitis.com SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C. 30 West Monroe Street, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60603 Tel: (312) 255-7200 Fax: (312) 422-1224 Angela S. Cash (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) acash@scopelitis.com Adam J. Eakman (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) aeakman@scopelitis.com SCOPELITIS GARVIN LIGHT HANSON & FEARY, P.C. 10 W. Market Street, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Tel: (317) 637-1777 Fax: (317) 687-2414 Attorneys for Defendant, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON NEXT PAGE 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 BILL BARKER, TAB BACHMAN, and WILLIAM YINGLING, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiffs, v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, and DOES 1 – 10, Inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES Action Filed: April 1, 2016 Removed: July 5, 2016 Discovery Cut-off: July 31, 2017 Expert Witness Disclosures: July 27, 2017 Class Certification: January 11, 2018 27 28 1 Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THE MARKHAM LAW FIRM David R. Markham (SBN 071814) dmarkham@markham-law.com Maggie Realin (SBN 263639) mrealin@markham-law.com 750 B Street, Suite 1950 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 399-3995 Fax: (619) 615-2067 THE RDM LEGAL GROUP Russell Myrick (SBN 270803) russel@rdmlg.com MANCHESTER FINANCIAL BUILDING 7970 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 400 La Jolla, CA 92037 Tel: (888) 482-8266 Fax: (858) 244-7930 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines 1 Plaintiffs, Bill Barker, Tab Bachman, and William Yingling (“Plaintiffs”) and 2 Defendant, Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC (“Swift”) pursuant to 3 USDC EDCA Local Rule 143 stipulate and agree as follows: 4 On September 6, 2016, this Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 16(b) and the Rule 26(f) Conference Statement of the parties, issued a Pretrial 6 Scheduling Order setting the discovery cut-off deadline for June 1, 2017 (ECF No. 7 15). On May 31, 2017, the Court entered an Order moving the discovery cut-off to 8 July 31, 2017 pursuant to the parties’ stipulation to extend the discovery cut-off for 9 sixty days (ECF No. 22). On September 14, 2017, the Court entered an order 10 extending the discovery cut-off to September 21, 2017 for the limited purpose of 11 resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ challenged discovery 12 responses and Defendant’s Third Supplemental Response to Plaintiffs’ Request for 13 Production of Documents, Set One (ECF No. 31). And on September 22, 2017, the 14 Court extended the same deadline to October 27, 2017 (ECF No. 35). 15 The parties mediated the case with the Honorable Charles McCoy (Ret.) on 16 October 20, 2017, but were unable to resolve the case at the mediation. Although 17 Plaintiffs have made progress and have acted with diligence in gathering the 18 documents and information necessary to complete their discovery responses, they 19 have not yet been able to produce the requested discovery but have advised that they 20 will do so on October 27, 2017. The parties, therefore, respectfully request a two- 21 week extension on the discovery cut-off deadline for the limited purpose of resolving 22 the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ challenged discovery responses 23 and, if necessary, for Defendants to file a discovery motion. Neither party will be 24 prejudiced by this extension. 25 The parties jointly propose that the deadlines in the Pretrial Scheduling Order 26 previously set forth by the Court be revised as follows, or set on such other date as 27 the Court determines: 28 3 Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines 1 2 Event Current Date 3 Discovery cut-off for the 4 limited purpose of resolving 5 the ongoing discovery 6 dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ 7 challenged discovery 8 Proposed Date responses October 27, 2017 November 10, 2017 9 10 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED and AGREED between the parties that all other 11 provisions of the Pretrial Scheduling Order of September 6, 2016 and subsequent 12 orders will remain in effect. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any 13 facsimile or electronic signature will be valid as an original signature. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Dated: October 27, 2017 17 18 SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C. By: 19 Angela S. Cash Attorneys for Defendant, 20 21 22 23 Dated: October 26, 2017 THE RDM LEGAL GROUP By: Russel Myrick Attorneys for Plaintiffs 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines ORDER 1 2 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, 3 the deadlines in the Scheduling Order previously set forth by the Court are revised as 4 follows: 5 6 Event Current Date 7 Discovery cut-off for the limited October 27, 2017 8 purpose of resolving the ongoing 9 discovery dispute regarding 10 November 10, 2017 Plaintiffs’ challenged discovery 11 Proposed Date responses 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED 14 15 16 17 Date: October 27, 2017 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?