Barker et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/27/2017 ORDERING Discovery cut-off for the limited purpose of resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs' challenged discovery responses is EXTENDED to 11/10/2017. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Christopher C. McNatt, Jr. (SBN 174559)
cmcnatt@scopelitis.com
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, LLP
2 North Lake Avenue, Suite 560
Pasadena, CA 91101
Tel: (626) 795-4700
Fax: (626) 795-4790
Adam C. Smedstad (SBN 303591)
asmedstad@scopelitis.com
Andrew J. Butcher (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
abutcher@scopelitis.com
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, P.C.
30 West Monroe Street, Suite 600
Chicago, IL 60603
Tel: (312) 255-7200
Fax: (312) 422-1224
Angela S. Cash (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
acash@scopelitis.com
Adam J. Eakman (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
aeakman@scopelitis.com
SCOPELITIS GARVIN LIGHT HANSON & FEARY, P.C.
10 W. Market Street, Suite 1400
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Tel: (317) 637-1777
Fax: (317) 687-2414
Attorneys for Defendant,
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC
ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON NEXT PAGE
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
BILL BARKER, TAB BACHMAN, and
WILLIAM YINGLING, individually and
on behalf of others similarly situated,
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiffs,
v.
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, and
DOES 1 – 10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO EXTEND CASE
DEADLINES
Action Filed: April 1, 2016
Removed: July 5, 2016
Discovery Cut-off: July 31, 2017
Expert Witness Disclosures: July 27,
2017
Class Certification: January 11, 2018
27
28
1
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
THE MARKHAM LAW FIRM
David R. Markham (SBN 071814)
dmarkham@markham-law.com
Maggie Realin (SBN 263639)
mrealin@markham-law.com
750 B Street, Suite 1950
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: (619) 399-3995
Fax: (619) 615-2067
THE RDM LEGAL GROUP
Russell Myrick (SBN 270803)
russel@rdmlg.com
MANCHESTER FINANCIAL BUILDING
7970 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 400
La Jolla, CA 92037
Tel: (888) 482-8266
Fax: (858) 244-7930
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines
1
Plaintiffs, Bill Barker, Tab Bachman, and William Yingling (“Plaintiffs”) and
2
Defendant, Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC (“Swift”) pursuant to
3
USDC EDCA Local Rule 143 stipulate and agree as follows:
4
On September 6, 2016, this Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
5
16(b) and the Rule 26(f) Conference Statement of the parties, issued a Pretrial
6
Scheduling Order setting the discovery cut-off deadline for June 1, 2017 (ECF No.
7
15). On May 31, 2017, the Court entered an Order moving the discovery cut-off to
8
July 31, 2017 pursuant to the parties’ stipulation to extend the discovery cut-off for
9
sixty days (ECF No. 22). On September 14, 2017, the Court entered an order
10
extending the discovery cut-off to September 21, 2017 for the limited purpose of
11
resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ challenged discovery
12
responses and Defendant’s Third Supplemental Response to Plaintiffs’ Request for
13
Production of Documents, Set One (ECF No. 31). And on September 22, 2017, the
14
Court extended the same deadline to October 27, 2017 (ECF No. 35).
15
The parties mediated the case with the Honorable Charles McCoy (Ret.) on
16
October 20, 2017, but were unable to resolve the case at the mediation. Although
17
Plaintiffs have made progress and have acted with diligence in gathering the
18
documents and information necessary to complete their discovery responses, they
19
have not yet been able to produce the requested discovery but have advised that they
20
will do so on October 27, 2017. The parties, therefore, respectfully request a two-
21
week extension on the discovery cut-off deadline for the limited purpose of resolving
22
the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ challenged discovery responses
23
and, if necessary, for Defendants to file a discovery motion. Neither party will be
24
prejudiced by this extension.
25
The parties jointly propose that the deadlines in the Pretrial Scheduling Order
26
previously set forth by the Court be revised as follows, or set on such other date as
27
the Court determines:
28
3
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines
1
2
Event
Current Date
3
Discovery cut-off for the
4
limited purpose of resolving
5
the ongoing discovery
6
dispute regarding Plaintiffs’
7
challenged discovery
8
Proposed Date
responses
October 27, 2017
November 10, 2017
9
10
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED and AGREED between the parties that all other
11
provisions of the Pretrial Scheduling Order of September 6, 2016 and subsequent
12
orders will remain in effect. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any
13
facsimile or electronic signature will be valid as an original signature.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Dated: October 27, 2017
17
18
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON
& FEARY, P.C.
By:
19
Angela S. Cash
Attorneys for Defendant,
20
21
22
23
Dated: October 26, 2017
THE RDM LEGAL GROUP
By:
Russel Myrick
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines
ORDER
1
2
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties,
3
the deadlines in the Scheduling Order previously set forth by the Court are revised as
4
follows:
5
6
Event
Current Date
7
Discovery cut-off for the limited
October 27, 2017
8
purpose of resolving the ongoing
9
discovery dispute regarding
10
November 10, 2017
Plaintiffs’ challenged discovery
11
Proposed Date
responses
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED
14
15
16
17
Date: October 27, 2017
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
Joint Stipulation and Order to Extend Case Deadlines
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?