Barker et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Filing
82
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/14/2020 STAYING the ruling on Plaintiffs' 32 motion for class certification and motion for conditional certification, and Defendants' 39 motion for partial summary judgment pending the outcome of mediation. The parties are to advise the Court the results of mediation within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation, on or before 12/18/2020.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
BILL BARKER, TAB BACHMAN, and
WILLIAM YINGLING, individually and
on behalf of others similarly situated,
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, and
DOES 1 – 10, Inclusive,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
REQUEST TO STAY RULING ON
PENDING MOTIONS DUE TO
MEDIATION
Action Filed: April 1, 2016
Removed:
July 5, 2016
Trial Date: Not Set
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Barker v. Swift Transportation Company, Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
Order Granting Joint Request for Stay Ruling on Pending Motions Due to
Mediation
1
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and pursuant to the joint request of the
2 parties, the Court hereby ORDERS the following:
3
1. The ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and motion for
4 conditional certification, and Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment are
5 hereby stayed pending the outcome of mediation.
6
2. The parties are to advise the Court the results of mediation within 10 days of
7 the conclusion of the mediation, on or before December 18, 2020.
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11 Dated: April 14, 2020
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Barker v. Swift Transportation Company, Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD
[Proposed] Order Granting Joint Request for Stay Ruling on Pending Motions Due
to Mediation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?