Barker et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC

Filing 82

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/14/2020 STAYING the ruling on Plaintiffs' 32 motion for class certification and motion for conditional certification, and Defendants' 39 motion for partial summary judgment pending the outcome of mediation. The parties are to advise the Court the results of mediation within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation, on or before 12/18/2020.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 BILL BARKER, TAB BACHMAN, and WILLIAM YINGLING, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, and DOES 1 – 10, Inclusive, Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO STAY RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS DUE TO MEDIATION Action Filed: April 1, 2016 Removed: July 5, 2016 Trial Date: Not Set Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Barker v. Swift Transportation Company, Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD Order Granting Joint Request for Stay Ruling on Pending Motions Due to Mediation 1 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and pursuant to the joint request of the 2 parties, the Court hereby ORDERS the following: 3 1. The ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and motion for 4 conditional certification, and Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment are 5 hereby stayed pending the outcome of mediation. 6 2. The parties are to advise the Court the results of mediation within 10 days of 7 the conclusion of the mediation, on or before December 18, 2020. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: April 14, 2020 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Barker v. Swift Transportation Company, Case No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Request for Stay Ruling on Pending Motions Due to Mediation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?