Whitely v. CDCR et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/4/2018 GRANTING 48 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants are GRANTED a 23-day extension of time nunc pro tunc, until 12/7/2018, to file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition to 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 EVERTON WHITELY, 2:16-cv-1534-KJM-EFB P 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 v. 15 16 CDCR, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted a 23-day extension of time nunc 20 pro tunc, until December 7, 2018, to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion 21 for summary judgment. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: December 4, 2018. 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?