Pickard v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER for the award of Attorney's fees pursuant to the equal access to justice act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D) signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/27/18. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 David J. Linden Attorney at Law CSBN 41221 Post Office Box 5780 Napa, CA 94581-0780 Tel. (707) 252-7007 Fax. (707) 252-7883 Email - david@lindenlaw.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 AHSHA PICKARD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-01545-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to 18 the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of ten thousand six hundred 19 seventy-five dollars and sixteen cents ($10,675.16) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 20 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in 21 connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d); 1920. 22 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Defendant will consider any assignment of 23 EAJA fees to David J. Linden. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), the ability to honor 24 any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States 25 PICKARD v. BERRYHILL, Acting COSS, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE E.A.J.A. FEES Page 1 1 Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the Defendant will 2 determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe 4 a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to David J. Linden, pursuant 5 to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to David J. Linden. 6 7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and does not 8 constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant. This award is without prejudice to the rights of 9 Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the 10 EAJA. 11 12 Dated: June 27, 2018 /s/ David J. Linden DAVID J. LINDEN Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: June 27, 2018 MCGREGOR SCOTT United States Attorney 13 14 15 By 16 17 /s/Michael K.Marriott MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT (as authorized by email on 6/27/2018) Special Assistant US Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 ORDER 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION , IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: 6/27/2018 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE PICKARD v. BERRYHILL, Acting COSS, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE E.A.J.A. FEES Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?