Parnell v. Martinez et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 01/05/17 ORDERING that the 10 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

J.P. PARNELL,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-01556 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

A. MARTINEZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On December 8, 2016, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s November 23, 2016 order dismissing plaintiff’s

19

complaint with leave to amend. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders

20

shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the

21

court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling is clearly erroneous or

22

contrary to law.

23

Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 10) is denied.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: January 5, 2017