Gray v. Muniz

Filing 57

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/26/2020 ADOPTING 55 Findings and Recommendations in full. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OLIVER GRAY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1577 JAM KJN P v. ORDER W.L. MUNIZ, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of 17 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 26, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. Respondent did not file a reply. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 26, 2020, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; and 4 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 5 § 2253. 6 7 8 9 DATED: May 26, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?