Ordonez v. Hunt & Henriques, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/8/16: HEARING as to 8 MOTION to STRIKE RESET for 11/3/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 THERESE S. HARRIS (SBN 246711) OF COUNSEL M. HARVEY REPHEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 935 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 7B PASO ROBLES, CA 93446 Telephone: 805-369-2053 Facsimile: 805-715-7824 tharris@tharrislawoffice.com 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff, GEORGE ORDONEZ 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 CASE NO: 2:16-cv-01596-TLN-GG GEORGE ORDONEZ, vs. HUNT & HENRIQUES, INC., ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: October 6, 2016 2:00 p.m. 2 Honorable Troy L. Nunley Defendant. 16 17 _____________________________________ 18 HUNT & HENRIQUES, INC., Counterclaimant, 19 20 21 22 23 vs. GEORGE ORDONEZ, CHRISTIAN ORDONEZ, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Counterdefendants. 24 25 26 27 28 Case #2:16-cv-01596-TLN-GG 1 of 2 ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE Ordonez v. Hunt & Henriques 1 Based on the Stipulation and Request for Continuance filed in this action, the 2 hearing scheduled for October 6, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. shall be continued until November 3 3, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. due to the unavailability of Plaintiff’s Counsel, Therese S. Harris for 4 pre-scheduled out of country travel. 5 6 7 8 Counsel is to keep the same briefing schedule with the Opposition due on September 22, 2016 and the Reply due on September 29, 2016. Ordonez is not to argue that the continued hearing date violates Code of Civil Procedure sec. 425.16(f). 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED: 11 12 Dated: September 8, 2016 13 14 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case #2:16-cv-01596-TLN-GG 2 of 2 ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE Ordonez v. Hunt & Henriques

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?