Ordonez v. Hunt & Henriques, Inc.

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/21/16 ORDERING the deadline for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, GEORGE ORDONEZ, and Counterdefendant, CHRISTIAN ORDONEZ, to file a responsive pleading to Defendant's Counterclaim is hereby extended to November 10, 2016.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 THERESE S. HARRIS (SBN 246711) OF COUNSEL M. HARVEY REPHEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 935 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 7B PASO ROBLES, CA 93446 Telephone: 805-369-2053 Facsimile: 805-715-7824 tharris@tharrislawoffice.com 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff, GEORGE ORDONEZ 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 GEORGE ORDONEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. CASE NO: 2:16-cv-01596-TLN-GG ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COUNTERCLAIM HUNT & HENRIQUES, INC., Defendant. 16 17 _____________________________________ 18 HUNT & HENRIQUES, INC., Counterclaimant, 19 20 21 22 23 vs. GEORGE ORDONEZ, CHRISTIAN ORDONEZ, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Counterdefendants. 24 25 26 27 28 Case #2:16-cv-01596-TLN-GG 1 of 2 Ordonez v. Hunt & Henriques ORDER GRANDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COUNTERCLAIM 1 Based on the Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Responsive Pleading to 2 Counterclaim filed in this action, the deadline for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 3 GEORGE ORDONEZ, and Counterdefendant, CHRISTIAN ORDONEZ, to file a 4 responsive pleading to Defendant’s Counterclaim is hereby extended to November 10, 5 2016. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: September 21, 2016 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case #2:16-cv-01596-TLN-GG 2 of 2 Ordonez v. Hunt & Henriques ORDER GRANDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COUNTERCLAIM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?