John v. County of Sacramento

Filing 12

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2017 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Defendant County of Sacramento from this action. (York, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN JOHN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1640 JAM DB PS

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a

17
18

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

19

On September 28, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings

22

and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2017 (ECF No. 9) are adopted in

3
4
5

full; and
2. Defendant County of Sacramento is dismissed from this action.
DATED: 12/19/2017

6

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2