Johnson-Hendricks v. Heath Benefits Center et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/06/16 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED as set forth in the stipulation. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 TWONESHA JOHNSONHENDRICKS, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, 11 12 Plaintiff, vs. 13 14 15 HEALTH BENEFITS CENTER, STEVE DORFMAN, DOES 1-10 inclusive, No. 2:16-cv-01649-JAM-CKD ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE NAMED PLAINTIFF AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE PUNITIVE CLASS 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHNSON-HENDRICKS v. HEALTH BENEFITS CENTER, et al. (CASE NO.:2:16-cv-01649-JAM-CKD) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 1 2 The Court, having received the parties Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice as to the Named Plaintiff and without Prejudice as to the 3 4 5 Putative Class, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Stipulation is GRANTED. This action 6 is hereby DISMISSED as set forth in the stipulation and the clerk is directed to 7 8 close the file. 9 10 11 SO ORDERED. 12 13 DATED: 12/6/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez_________ 14 15 Honorable John A. Mendez 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHNSON-HENDRICKS v. HEALTH BENEFITS CENTER, et al. (CASE NO.:2:16-cv-01649-JAM-CKD) [[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?