Johnson-Hendricks v. Heath Benefits Center et al
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/06/16 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED as set forth in the stipulation. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
TWONESHA JOHNSONHENDRICKS, individually and on
behalf of other similarly situated,
11
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
13
14
15
HEALTH BENEFITS CENTER,
STEVE DORFMAN, DOES 1-10
inclusive,
No. 2:16-cv-01649-JAM-CKD
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO
THE NAMED PLAINTIFF AND
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE
PUNITIVE CLASS
16
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOHNSON-HENDRICKS v. HEALTH BENEFITS CENTER, et al. (CASE NO.:2:16-cv-01649-JAM-CKD)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
1
2
The Court, having received the parties Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of
Action with Prejudice as to the Named Plaintiff and without Prejudice as to the
3
4
5
Putative Class, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Stipulation is GRANTED. This action
6
is hereby DISMISSED as set forth in the stipulation and the clerk is directed to
7
8
close the file.
9
10
11
SO ORDERED.
12
13
DATED: 12/6/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez_________
14
15
Honorable John A. Mendez
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOHNSON-HENDRICKS v. HEALTH BENEFITS CENTER, et al. (CASE NO.:2:16-cv-01649-JAM-CKD)
[[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?