Wiggins v. Ducart

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/5/16 DENYING 1 Motion for Extension of time. Within 30 days, petitioner shall file a petition that complies with the requirements of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Federal Ru les of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice; the petition must bear the docket number assigned this case; petitioner must file an original and two copies of the petition. Petitioner shall also submit, within 30 days from the date of th is order, the application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the filing fee in the amount of $5.00. Petitioners failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the courts form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMARIO WIGGINS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1669 KJN P v. ORDER CLARK DUCART, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison, has filed a document styled as 17 18 motion for extension of time to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 1.) No other 19 pleadings have been filed by the petitioner. 20 In order to commence an action, petitioner must file a petition for writ of habeas corpus as 21 required by Rule 3 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases, and petitioner must either pay the 22 required filing fee or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 23 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The court will not issue any orders granting or denying relief until 24 an action has been properly commenced. Therefore, petitioner’s motion for an extension of time 25 is denied without prejudice. Unless petitioner files a petition, and submits an application 26 requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis or submits the appropriate filing fee, this action 27 will be dismissed. 28 //// 1 1 Petitioner is advised that a one year statute of limitations is applicable to all claims 2 presented in a federal habeas corpus petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); see also Mardesich v. 3 Cate, 668 F.3d 1164 (9th Cir. 2012) (holding that the one year statute of limitations applied to 4 each claim in a habeas petition on an individual basis). Accordingly, petitioner is advised to file 5 his federal habeas corpus petition as soon as possible. 6 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Petitioner’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 1) is denied without prejudice; 8 2. Within thirty days,1 petitioner shall file a petition that complies with the requirements 9 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local 10 Rules of Practice; the petition must bear the docket number assigned this case; petitioner must file 11 an original and two copies of the petition. 12 3. Petitioner shall also submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, the 13 application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the filing 14 fee in the amount of $5.00. 4. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this 15 16 matter be dismissed. 17 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the court’s form for filing a 18 petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. 19 Dated: August 5, 2016 20 21 22 /wigg1669.nopetition 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 By setting this deadline, the court makes no finding or representation that the petition is not subject to dismissal as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1231-35 (9th Cir. 2015). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?