Alder v. County of Yolo
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Vince Chhabria on 11/9/2016 ORDERING that the Parties file a Case Management Conference with the Court on or before 12/13/2016, and that the Initial Case Management Conference is set for 12/20/2016. (Zignago, K.)
1 Gary Messing, Bar No. 075363
gary@majlabor.com
2 Jason H. Jasmine, Bar No. 215757
jason@majlabor.com
3 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP
Attorneys at Law
4 980 9th Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, California 95814
5 Telephone:
916.446.5297
Facsimile:
916.448.5047
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 EVAN ALDER, on behalf of himself and
all similarly situated individuals,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Complaint Filed:
16 COUNTY OF YOLO,
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
Defendant.
July 20, 2016
Case Management
Conference Date:
November 15, 2016
18
19
20
21
STIPULATION
These stipulations are entered into by and between Plaintiff EVAN ALDER, on behalf of
22 himself and all similarly situated individuals (“the Plaintiffs”) and the County of Yolo (“County”),
23 collectively, (“the Parties”), with respect to allegations and claims in the above-named Complaint,
24 “the Alder Complaint.” The Parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations as to one
25 portion of the Complaint and are currently in discussions regarding case management.
26
According to the timelines currently set forth in this action, the Parties must file a Case
27 Management Statement with the Court by November 8, 2016, and appear at the Initial Case
28 Management Conference on November 15, 2016. The County was served with the Complaint on
1
JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
1 October 19, 2016. Furthermore, the Parties have just entered into a Joint Stipulation to allow the
2 County a two-week continuance for responding to the Complaint.
3
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached this Stipulation in order to: (1) conserve resources;
4 and (2) address the costs, time, and risks of continued litigation; and (3) to continue engaging in
5 settlement discussions prior to the case management conference.
6
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties to the
7 above-referenced action, through their respective attorneys of record, that the following be
8 adopted as the findings and Order of this Court:
9
1.
With the permission of the Court, the Parties agree that the initial Case
10 Management Conference be scheduled for December 20, 2016.
11
2.
With the permission of the Court, the Parties agree that the Case Management
12 Statement be filed with the Court on or before December 13, 2016.
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
13
14
15 Dated: November 8, 2016
PHILIP J. POGLEDICH
COUNTY COUNSEL
16
17
By: /s/ Ronald J. Martinez
RONALD J. MARTINEZ
DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL
Attorney for Defendant
18
19
20
21
Dated: November 8, 2016
MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP
22
23
By: /s/ Gary M. Messing
GARY M. MESSING
Attorney for Plaintiff
24
25
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
-2-
JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
1
ORDER
2
Based on the Joint Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore,
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Parties file a Case
4 Management Conference with the Court on or before December 13, 2016, and that the Initial Case
5 Management Conference be set for December 20, 2016.
6
November 9, 2016
7 Dated: ________________
8
______________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?