Alder v. County of Yolo

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Vince Chhabria on 11/9/2016 ORDERING that the Parties file a Case Management Conference with the Court on or before 12/13/2016, and that the Initial Case Management Conference is set for 12/20/2016. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 Gary Messing, Bar No. 075363 gary@majlabor.com 2 Jason H. Jasmine, Bar No. 215757 jason@majlabor.com 3 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP Attorneys at Law 4 980 9th Street, Suite 380 Sacramento, California 95814 5 Telephone: 916.446.5297 Facsimile: 916.448.5047 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 EVAN ALDER, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated individuals, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 v. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Complaint Filed: 16 COUNTY OF YOLO, 17 Case No. 2:16-cv-01682-VC Defendant. July 20, 2016 Case Management Conference Date: November 15, 2016 18 19 20 21 STIPULATION These stipulations are entered into by and between Plaintiff EVAN ALDER, on behalf of 22 himself and all similarly situated individuals (“the Plaintiffs”) and the County of Yolo (“County”), 23 collectively, (“the Parties”), with respect to allegations and claims in the above-named Complaint, 24 “the Alder Complaint.” The Parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations as to one 25 portion of the Complaint and are currently in discussions regarding case management. 26 According to the timelines currently set forth in this action, the Parties must file a Case 27 Management Statement with the Court by November 8, 2016, and appear at the Initial Case 28 Management Conference on November 15, 2016. The County was served with the Complaint on 1 JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC 1 October 19, 2016. Furthermore, the Parties have just entered into a Joint Stipulation to allow the 2 County a two-week continuance for responding to the Complaint. 3 WHEREAS, the Parties have reached this Stipulation in order to: (1) conserve resources; 4 and (2) address the costs, time, and risks of continued litigation; and (3) to continue engaging in 5 settlement discussions prior to the case management conference. 6 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties to the 7 above-referenced action, through their respective attorneys of record, that the following be 8 adopted as the findings and Order of this Court: 9 1. With the permission of the Court, the Parties agree that the initial Case 10 Management Conference be scheduled for December 20, 2016. 11 2. With the permission of the Court, the Parties agree that the Case Management 12 Statement be filed with the Court on or before December 13, 2016. IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 13 14 15 Dated: November 8, 2016 PHILIP J. POGLEDICH COUNTY COUNSEL 16 17 By: /s/ Ronald J. Martinez RONALD J. MARTINEZ DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL Attorney for Defendant 18 19 20 21 Dated: November 8, 2016 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP 22 23 By: /s/ Gary M. Messing GARY M. MESSING Attorney for Plaintiff 24 25 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / -2- JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC 1 ORDER 2 Based on the Joint Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Parties file a Case 4 Management Conference with the Court on or before December 13, 2016, and that the Initial Case 5 Management Conference be set for December 20, 2016. 6 November 9, 2016 7 Dated: ________________ 8 ______________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?