Alder v. County of Yolo
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE signed by District Judge Vince Chhabria on 8/31/2018. (Zignago, K.)
1 Gary M. Messing, Bar No. 75363
gary@majlabor.com
2 Jason H Jasmine, Bar No. 215757
jason@majlabor.com
3 D. Paul Bird II, Bar No. 202066
paul@majlabor.com
4 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP
235 Montgomery St., Suite 828
5 San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
415.266.1800
6 Facsimile:
415.266.1128
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff EVAN ALDER, et al.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 EVAN ALDER, on behalf of himself and all
similarly situated individuals,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
COUNTY OF YOLO,
16
Defendant.
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
The Hon. Vince Chhabria
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00057346-1
MESSING ADAM &
JASMINE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Case No. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Parties’ Joint Motion Advising Court of Settlement
3 Administration and Seeking an Order to Dismiss Action with Prejudice and the supporting
4 Declarations. Based on a review of the record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
5 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
6
1.
The Court has made no findings or determination regarding the law, and none of
7 the materials or documents prepared or submitted in support of the Parties’ Joint Motion for
8 Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice shall constitute evidence of, or any
9 admission of, any violation of law;
10
2.
Judgment is entered in this action, and this action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.
11
12 IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
August 31
14 Dated: ______________________, 2018
15
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MESSING ADAM &
JASMINE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
00057346-1
Case No. 2:16-cv-01682-VC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?