Downer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DISMISSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/24/2017 ORDERING that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Young Cho
Attorney at Law: 189870
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jack Downer
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
JACK DOWNER,
16
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
18
19
20
Defendant.
) Case No.: CV 16-1684 AC
)
) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
21
22
23
24
TO THE HONORABLE ALLISON CLAIRE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Jack Downer (“Plaintiff”)
25
and Carolyn W. Colvin as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security
26
(“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its
-1-
1
own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to
2
the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B).
3
DATE: January 17, 2017
4
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
5
/s/ Young Cho
BY: __________________
Young Cho
Attorney for plaintiff Jack Downer
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
DATE: January 17, 2017
9
PHILIP A. TALBERT
Acting United States Attorney
10
/s/ Donna W. Anderson
11
DONNA W. ANDERSON
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
(Per e-mail authorization)
12
13
14
15
16
ORDER
Approved and so ordered. The clerk is directed to close this case.
17
18
DATE: January 24, 2017
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?