Hoffmann v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/25/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 13 request for leave to file new evidence. Plaintiff is ADVISED that any further documents filed under this case number will be DISREGARDED, and that no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KASEY F. HOFFMANN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-1691 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On June 7, 2018, plaintiff filed a request to file a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
18
19
Procedure 60(b) on grounds of new evidence and abuse of discretion. See ECF No. 13. For the
20
reasons stated herein, this request will be denied.
This civil rights action was closed and judgment was entered on April 19, 2017. See ECF
21
22
Nos. 11, 12. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1) requires that a Rule 60(b) motion based
23
upon new evidence be made within a reasonable time which, in this instance, should have been
24
within a year after the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60(c)(1). Thus, this request is
25
not timely.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for leave to file new
evidence (ECF No. 13) is DENIED.
Plaintiff is advised that any further documents filed under this case number will be
4
disregarded, and that no orders will issue in response to future filings.
5
DATED: June 25, 2018.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?