Haddad, M.D. v. SMG Long Term Disability Plan et al

Filing 129

MINUTES for proceedings held via video conference before William H. Orrick, III: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE held on 6/15/2021; Counsel heard on the prejudgment interest issue. The Court will, in its discretion and as indicated in its 5/28/2021 Or der, DENY the request for prejudgment interest. Counsel heard on plaintiff's 128 motion for reconsideration on the Hilton offset issue. The motion for reconsideration is DENIED. There is no justification to revisit the Court's 9/22/2020 Order allowing defendant to take that offset. The parties shall submit an agreed-to proposed form of judgment (or a redline version reflecting any disagreements regarding the terms) by 6/24/2021 for review. No further Court action or submission from the parties in this case is warranted. Plaintiffs Counsel Laurence Padway present. Defendants Counsel Michael Bernacchi present. Court Reporter/CD Number: Belle Ball. (Zignago, K.)

Case 2:16-cv-01700-WHO Document 129 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES
Date: June 15, 2021
Case No.: 16-cv-1700

Attorney for Plaintiff:
Attorney for Defendant:
Deputy Clerk: Jean Davis

Time: 13 minutes
Judge: WILLIAM H. ORRICK
2:14 p.m. to 2:27 p.m.
Case Name: Haddad v. SMG

Laurence Padway
Michael Bernacchi
Court Reporter: Belle Ball

PROCEEDINGS
Case Management Conference conducted via videoconference.
Counsel heard on the prejudgment interest issue. The Court will, in its discretion and as
indicated in its May 28, 2021 Order, DENY the request for prejudgment interest.
Counsel heard on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration on the Hilton offset issue. Dkt. No. 128.
The motion for reconsideration is DENIED. There is no justification to revisit the Court’s
September 22, 2020 Order allowing defendant to take that offset.
The parties shall submit an agreed-to proposed form of judgment (or a redline version reflecting
any disagreements regarding the terms) by 6/24/2021 for review. No further Court action or
submission from the parties in this case is warranted.