Haddad, M.D. v. SMG Long Term Disability Plan et al
Filing
55
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by William H Orrick, III on 5/20/2019 ORDERING that the Parties shall file their agreement resolving the STD benefits and remanding the LTD claim on or before 5/22/2019. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
Laurence F. Padway (SBN 89314)
1516 Oak Street, Suite 109
Alameda, CA 94501
Tel: 510.814.6100
Fax: 510.814.0650
Attorneys for Plaintiff Fadi G. Haddad, M.D.
Michael B. Bernacchi (SBN 163657)
E-mail: mbernacchi@bwslaw.com
Keiko J. Kojima (SBN 206595)
E-mail: kkojima@bwslaw.com
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953
Tel: 213.236.0600
Fax: 213.236.2700
Attorneys for Defendant Hartford Life and
Accident Insurance Company
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO
14
15
FADI G. HADDAD, M.D.,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
SMG LONG TERM DISABILITY
PLAN, AND HARTFORD LIFE
AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE
COMPANY,
19
20
Case No. 2:16-cv-01700-WHO
SECOND STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE DEADLINE TO
SUBMIT AGREEMENT RE STD
BENEFITS; AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
21
22
23
The Parties, Plaintiff Fadi G. Haddad, M.D. (“Plaintiff” or “Dr. Haddad”),
24
and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”),
25
through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree based on the following:
26
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2019, the Parties filed their updated joint case
27
management statement proposing a briefing schedule to resolve the outstanding
28
STD claim. [Dkt. 50] The Court approved the briefing proposal and set the
LA #4849-0201-0007 v1
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE TO SUBMIT AGREEMENT RE SDT
BENEFITS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
following briefing deadlines: (1) concurrent opening briefs due by May 10, 2019;
2
and (2) concurrent reply briefs due by May 17, 2019. [Dkt. 51]
3
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached an agreement to resolve the
4
outstanding STD claim and allow this case to be remanded back to Hartford for the
5
adjudication of Dr. Haddad’s LTD claim. The Parties requested that the briefing
6
schedule in Docket 51 be vacated, which the Court granted and ordered the Parties
7
to file their stipulation on or before May 17, 2019. [Dkt. 52, 53] However, the
8
Parties actually intended to request more time, but due to a scrivener’s error, put in
9
the wrong date.
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the Parties request an additional extension to file a stipulation
regarding the resolution of the STD case up to and including May 22, 2019.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
13
14
Dated: May 17, 2019
Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway
15
By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway
Laurence F. Padway
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Fadi G. Haddad, M.D.
16
17
18
19
Dated: May 17, 2019
20
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
By: /s/ Michael B. Bernacchi
Michael B. Bernacchi
Keiko J. Kojima
Attorneys for Defendant
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance
Company
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA #4849-0201-0007 v1
-2-
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE TO SUBMIT AGREEMENT RE SDT
BENEFITS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Michael B. Bernacchi, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from the other Signatory.
5
6
Dated: May 17, 2019
7
By: /s/ Michael B. Bernacchi
Michael B. Bernacchi
8
9
10
(PROPOSED) ORDER
11
Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
12
ORDERED that the Parties shall file their agreement resolving the STD benefits
13
and remanding the LTD claim on or before May 22, 2019.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: May 20, 2019
17
________________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick III
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA #4849-0201-0007 v1
-3-
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE TO SUBMIT AGREEMENT RE SDT
BENEFITS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?