Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/02/17 ORDERING that that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA for $4,750.00. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 4 SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202 Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP 42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400 Stockton, California 95202 Telephone: (209) 948-9384 Facsimile: (209) 948-0706 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO BRANCH 9 10 BARNEY RAY LEWIS, 11 12 13 14 Case No.: 2:16-CV-01705-AC Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 15 Defendant 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 18 19 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the 20 EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS 21 ($4,750.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of 22 Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 23 24 25 26 27 2412. After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the 28 assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 2:16-cv-01705-AC Page 1 1 the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees 2 and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 4 5 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the 6 payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Shellie Lott, pursuant to the 7 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. 8 9 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 10 11 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 12 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to 13 EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 14 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security 15 Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 16 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 19 Dated: October 2, 2017 20 /s/ Shellie Lott SHELLIE LOTT Attorney for Plaintiff 21 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH L. STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 22 23 24 25 Date: October 2, 2017 26 /s/ Jennifer A. Kenney (As authorized via email on 09/28/2017) JENNIFER A. KENNEY Special Assistant United States Attorney 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 2:16-cv-01705-AC Page 2 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation, it is so ordered. 3 4 Dated: October 2, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 2:16-cv-01705-AC Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?