Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/02/17 ORDERING that that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA for $4,750.00. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. (Benson, A.)
1
4
SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: (209) 948-9384
Facsimile: (209) 948-0706
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO BRANCH
9
10
BARNEY RAY LEWIS,
11
12
13
14
Case No.: 2:16-CV-01705-AC
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
15
Defendant
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
18
19
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the
20
EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS
21
($4,750.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of
22
Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §
23
24
25
26
27
2412.
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government
will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's
attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the
28
assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
2:16-cv-01705-AC
Page 1
1
the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees
2
and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
3
Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
4
5
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the
6
payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Shellie Lott, pursuant to the
7
assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.
8
9
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA
attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
10
11
Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release
12
from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to
13
EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.
14
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security
15
Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
Dated: October 2, 2017
20
/s/ Shellie Lott
SHELLIE LOTT
Attorney for Plaintiff
21
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH L. STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
22
23
24
25
Date: October 2, 2017
26
/s/ Jennifer A. Kenney
(As authorized via email on 09/28/2017)
JENNIFER A. KENNEY
Special Assistant United States Attorney
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
2:16-cv-01705-AC
Page 2
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation, it is so ordered.
3
4
Dated: October 2, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
2:16-cv-01705-AC
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?