Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/11/16 ORDERING that the 6 Motion to expedite discovery is GRANTED subject to the restrictions outlined in the order. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2701-JAM-KJN, et al. v. ORDER JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS, et al. 16 Defendants. 17 18 On May 5, 2016, the court conducted a global hearing with respect to plaintiff Malibu 19 20 Media, LLC’s ex parte motions to conduct expedited discovery that had been pending in several 21 related actions filed by plaintiff in the Sacramento division of this district. In connection with 22 those motions, plaintiff lodged with the court for initial in camera review a status report 23 addressing various questions/issues outlined in the court’s April 8, 2016 order scheduling the 24 May 5, 2016 hearing, as well as representative samples of plaintiff’s settlement correspondence 25 and settlement agreements. The status report was subsequently filed on the court’s public docket, 26 and the exhibits to the status report, which contain confidential settlement correspondence and 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 settlement agreements, were filed under seal.1 At the May 5, 2016 hearing, plaintiff’s sole owner, 2 Colette Pelisseir Field, appeared along with counsel and responded to further questioning by the 3 court. Following that hearing, on May 10, 2016, the court issued a comprehensive order granting 4 the motions to conduct expedited discovery in all of the related cases, subject to certain 5 restrictions identified in that order. 6 Subsequently, plaintiff commenced several new actions, which were also ultimately 7 related to this action on August 4, 2016. Thereafter, on September 28, 2016, plaintiff filed ex 8 parte motions to conduct expedited discovery in each of the newly-related actions, which were 9 then submitted for decision on the record and written briefing without a hearing. After carefully considering the court’s record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY 10 11 ORDERED that: 1. Based on the showing made in plaintiff’s motions, as well as plaintiff’s representations 12 13 made in its status report filed in Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned 14 IP address, 2:15-cv-2701-JAM-KJN, ECF Nos. 11, 12, and verbally 15 at the May 5, 2016 hearing in that matter, the court finds that plaintiff has shown that 16 good cause exists to conduct the requested expedited discovery in these cases in an 17 attempt to identify the respective John Doe defendants. See Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo 18 Electron Am, Inc., 208 F.R.D. 273, 276 (N.D. Cal. 2002). As such, plaintiff’s motions 19 are GRANTED, subject to the restrictions outlined below. 20 2. Plaintiff may immediately serve a Rule 45 subpoena (“Subpoena”) on the internet 21 service provider (“ISP”) identified in Exhibit A to the operative complaint in each 22 case, or on any other entity identified as providing internet services to the John Doe 23 defendant at the particular IP address, to obtain information to identify the John Doe 24 defendant; more specifically, his or her name and address. The ISP shall NOT release 25 the subscriber’s telephone number or e-mail address. A copy of this order shall be 26 27 28 1 Those documents were filed on the court’s docket in the first-filed case, Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address, 2:15-cv-2701-JAM-KJN, ECF Nos. 11, 12. 2 1 2 attached to the Subpoena in each case. 3. The ISP shall have 30 days from the date of service of the Subpoena upon it to serve 3 the John Doe defendant with a copy of the Subpoena and a copy of this order. The 4 ISP may serve the John Doe defendant using any reasonable means, including written 5 notice sent to his or her last known address, transmitted either by first-class mail or via 6 overnight service. 7 4. The John Doe defendant shall have 60 days from the date of service of the Subpoena 8 and this order upon him or her to file any motions with this court contesting the 9 Subpoena (including a motion to quash or modify the Subpoena), as well as any 10 request to litigate the Subpoena anonymously. The ISP may NOT turn over the John 11 Doe defendant’s identifying information to plaintiff before the expiration of this 60- 12 day period. Additionally, if the John Doe defendant or ISP files a motion to quash the 13 Subpoena, the ISP may not turn over any information to the plaintiff until the motion 14 has been resolved by the court. A John Doe defendant who moves to quash or modify 15 the subpoena, or to proceed anonymously, shall at the same time as his or her filing 16 notify the ISP so that the ISP is on notice not to release any of the John Doe 17 defendant’s information to plaintiff until the court rules on any such motions. 18 5. If the above-mentioned time periods elapse without the John Doe defendant or ISP 19 contesting the Subpoena, the ISP shall have 10 days to produce the information 20 responsive to the Subpoena to plaintiff. 21 6. Upon service with the Subpoena, the ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information 22 until either the information is produced to plaintiff or a timely-filed motion to quash 23 the subpoena is resolved by the court. 24 7. Any information ultimately disclosed to plaintiff in response to a Subpoena may be 25 used by plaintiff for the sole purpose of protecting plaintiff’s rights as set forth in the 26 operative complaint. 27 28 This order resolves all pending ex parte motions for expedited discovery in the following cases, and shall be filed by the Clerk of Court on the dockets of all the following cases: 3 1 2:16-cv-01708-JAM-KJN ECF No. 15 2 2:16-cv-01709- JAM-KJN ECF No. 16 3 2:16-cv-01710- JAM-KJN ECF No. 9 4 2:16-cv-01711- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 5 2:16-cv-01712- JAM-KJN ECF No. 9 6 2:16-cv-01713-JAM-KJN ECF No. 6 7 2:16-cv-01714- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 8 2:16-cv-01715- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 9 2:16-cv-01716- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 10 2:16-cv-01717- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 11 2:16-cv-01718- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 12 2:16-cv-01719- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 13 2:16-cv-01720- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 14 2:16-cv-01721- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 15 2:16-cv-01722-JAM-KJN ECF No. 6 16 2:16-cv-01723- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 17 2:16-cv-01724- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 18 2:16-cv-01725- JAM-KJN ECF No. 6 19 2:16-cv-01726- JAM-KJN ECF No. 6 20 2:16-cv-01727- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 21 2:16-cv-01728- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 22 2:16-cv-01729- JAM-KJN ECF No. 8 23 2:16-cv-01733- JAM-KJN ECF No. 7 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 11, 2016 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?