Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/11/16 ORDERING that the 7 Motion to expedite discovery is GRANTED subject to the restrictions outlined in the order. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-2701-JAM-KJN, et al.
v.
ORDER
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED
IP ADDRESS 108.206.113.196, et al.
16
Defendants.
17
18
On May 5, 2016, the court conducted a global hearing with respect to plaintiff Malibu
19
20
Media, LLC’s ex parte motions to conduct expedited discovery that had been pending in several
21
related actions filed by plaintiff in the Sacramento division of this district. In connection with
22
those motions, plaintiff lodged with the court for initial in camera review a status report
23
addressing various questions/issues outlined in the court’s April 8, 2016 order scheduling the
24
May 5, 2016 hearing, as well as representative samples of plaintiff’s settlement correspondence
25
and settlement agreements. The status report was subsequently filed on the court’s public docket,
26
and the exhibits to the status report, which contain confidential settlement correspondence and
27
////
28
////
1
1
settlement agreements, were filed under seal.1 At the May 5, 2016 hearing, plaintiff’s sole owner,
2
Colette Pelisseir Field, appeared along with counsel and responded to further questioning by the
3
court. Following that hearing, on May 10, 2016, the court issued a comprehensive order granting
4
the motions to conduct expedited discovery in all of the related cases, subject to certain
5
restrictions identified in that order.
6
Subsequently, plaintiff commenced several new actions, which were also ultimately
7
related to this action on August 4, 2016. Thereafter, on September 28, 2016, plaintiff filed ex
8
parte motions to conduct expedited discovery in each of the newly-related actions, which were
9
then submitted for decision on the record and written briefing without a hearing.
After carefully considering the court’s record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY
10
11
ORDERED that:
1. Based on the showing made in plaintiff’s motions, as well as plaintiff’s representations
12
13
made in its status report filed in Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned
14
IP address 108.206.113.196, 2:15-cv-2701-JAM-KJN, ECF Nos. 11, 12, and verbally
15
at the May 5, 2016 hearing in that matter, the court finds that plaintiff has shown that
16
good cause exists to conduct the requested expedited discovery in these cases in an
17
attempt to identify the respective John Doe defendants. See Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo
18
Electron Am, Inc., 208 F.R.D. 273, 276 (N.D. Cal. 2002). As such, plaintiff’s motions
19
are GRANTED, subject to the restrictions outlined below.
20
2. Plaintiff may immediately serve a Rule 45 subpoena (“Subpoena”) on the internet
21
service provider (“ISP”) identified in Exhibit A to the operative complaint in each
22
case, or on any other entity identified as providing internet services to the John Doe
23
defendant at the particular IP address, to obtain information to identify the John Doe
24
defendant; more specifically, his or her name and address. The ISP shall NOT release
25
the subscriber’s telephone number or e-mail address. A copy of this order shall be
26
27
28
1
Those documents were filed on the court’s docket in the first-filed case, Malibu Media, LLC v.
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.206.113.196, 2:15-cv-2701-JAM-KJN, ECF Nos.
11, 12.
2
1
2
attached to the Subpoena in each case.
3. The ISP shall have 30 days from the date of service of the Subpoena upon it to serve
3
the John Doe defendant with a copy of the Subpoena and a copy of this order. The
4
ISP may serve the John Doe defendant using any reasonable means, including written
5
notice sent to his or her last known address, transmitted either by first-class mail or via
6
overnight service.
7
4. The John Doe defendant shall have 60 days from the date of service of the Subpoena
8
and this order upon him or her to file any motions with this court contesting the
9
Subpoena (including a motion to quash or modify the Subpoena), as well as any
10
request to litigate the Subpoena anonymously. The ISP may NOT turn over the John
11
Doe defendant’s identifying information to plaintiff before the expiration of this 60-
12
day period. Additionally, if the John Doe defendant or ISP files a motion to quash the
13
Subpoena, the ISP may not turn over any information to the plaintiff until the motion
14
has been resolved by the court. A John Doe defendant who moves to quash or modify
15
the subpoena, or to proceed anonymously, shall at the same time as his or her filing
16
notify the ISP so that the ISP is on notice not to release any of the John Doe
17
defendant’s information to plaintiff until the court rules on any such motions.
18
5. If the above-mentioned time periods elapse without the John Doe defendant or ISP
19
contesting the Subpoena, the ISP shall have 10 days to produce the information
20
responsive to the Subpoena to plaintiff.
21
6. Upon service with the Subpoena, the ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information
22
until either the information is produced to plaintiff or a timely-filed motion to quash
23
the subpoena is resolved by the court.
24
7. Any information ultimately disclosed to plaintiff in response to a Subpoena may be
25
used by plaintiff for the sole purpose of protecting plaintiff’s rights as set forth in the
26
operative complaint.
27
28
This order resolves all pending ex parte motions for expedited discovery in the following
cases, and shall be filed by the Clerk of Court on the dockets of all the following cases:
3
1
2:16-cv-01708-JAM-KJN
ECF No. 15
2
2:16-cv-01709- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 16
3
2:16-cv-01710- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 9
4
2:16-cv-01711- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
5
2:16-cv-01712- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 9
6
2:16-cv-01713-JAM-KJN
ECF No. 6
7
2:16-cv-01714- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
8
2:16-cv-01715- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
9
2:16-cv-01716- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
10
2:16-cv-01717- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
11
2:16-cv-01718- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
12
2:16-cv-01719- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
13
2:16-cv-01720- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
14
2:16-cv-01721- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
15
2:16-cv-01722-JAM-KJN
ECF No. 6
16
2:16-cv-01723- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
17
2:16-cv-01724- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
18
2:16-cv-01725- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 6
19
2:16-cv-01726- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 6
20
2:16-cv-01727- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
21
2:16-cv-01728- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
22
2:16-cv-01729- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 8
23
2:16-cv-01733- JAM-KJN
ECF No. 7
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 11, 2016
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?