Vu v. Rackley
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/24/2017 ORDERING, within 21 days, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending 10 motion to dismiss.(Yin, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MAI THI VU,
No. 2:16-cv-1732 MCE AC P
Petitioner is a former1 state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 30, 2017, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the
petition. ECF No. 10. Petitioner has not filed any response to respondent’s motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days after the filing
date of this order, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to
the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation
that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b).
DATED: March 24, 2017
Petitioner recently filed a notice of change of address that indicates she is no longer in custody.
ECF No. 11.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?