Davenport v. Gomez et al.

Filing 10

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/6/17 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAMES DAVENPORT,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-1739 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS

SGT. GOMEZ, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

By order filed November 22, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

18

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and

19

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20
21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign
a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule
110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

27

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

28

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
1

1

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

2

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

3

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: January 6, 2017

5
6
7

/dave1739.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2