Davenport v. Gomez et al.

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/21/2018 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's claims concerning eye care in April of 2015 and thereafter are DISMISSED without prejudice.(Reader, L)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

JAMES DAVENPORT,

6
7
8

No. 2:16-cv-1739 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SGT. GOMEZ, et al.,

9

Defendants.

10
11

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

12

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

13

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

14

On January 18, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

15

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

16

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed

17

objections to the findings and recommendations.

18

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

19

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

20

ORDERED that:

21

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 18, 2018, are adopted in full; and

22

2. Plaintiff’s claims concerning eye care in April of 2015 and thereafter are dismissed

23

without prejudice.

24

DATED: February 21, 2018

25

/s/ John A. Mendez________________________

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28
1