Carroll v. State of California et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/2017 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed 12/9/2016, ECF No. 21 , is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TREMAYNE DEON CARROLL,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-1759 TLN KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On December 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration (ECF No. 25) of the

18

Magistrate Judge’s order filed December 9, 2016, denying Plaintiff’s motion for counsel (ECF

19

No. 21). Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

20

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it

21

does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22
23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
Magistrate Judge filed December 9, 2016, (ECF No. 21), is affirmed.

24
25

Dated: January 10, 2017

26
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

27
28
1