Carroll v. State of California et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/2017 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed 12/9/2016, ECF No. 21 , is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TREMAYNE DEON CARROLL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-1759 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On December 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration (ECF No. 25) of the 18 Magistrate Judge’s order filed December 9, 2016, denying Plaintiff’s motion for counsel (ECF 19 No. 21). Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless 20 “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it 21 does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 22 23 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed December 9, 2016, (ECF No. 21), is affirmed. 24 25 Dated: January 10, 2017 26 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?